OpenStreetMap

Diary Entries in English

Recent diary entries

1000th Edit

Posted by dygituljunky on 8 July 2014 in English (English)

It took me several years but I've made it to my 1000th edit!

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24016913

Location: Columbia Drive, Belvedere Park, DeKalb County, Georgia, 30032, United States of America

Parking restrictions

Posted by Midnightlightning on 7 July 2014 in English (English)

I've found the parking lot signs aren't that useful on the University of Wisconsin campus, if you're not familiar with the various lots. Some lots require a permit, and some are metered parking. If you're permit-less and looking for somewhere to park, the signs at the entryway to each lot are not that useful from a distance. Each has a red band at the top with white lettering indicating either "PERMIT REQUIRED" or "METERS ENFORCED" above the common "Monday-Friday, 7am-4:30pm". From a distance, since both are red bands, and two words long, it's hard to distinguish at a glance, before turning into the lot itself.

The UW parking map (http://transportation.wisc.edu/files/14_15ParkingMap.jpg) isn't much more helpful, only differentiating the permit-vs.-meter lots with a "M" symbol on the metered lots.

So, I started tagging the parking lots in OpenStreetMap with the proper "access" tags, and hopefully some parking app can parse them and make an easier parking experience while on-campus.

The permit-required lots are:

access=private access:conditional=public @ Mo-Fr 00:00-07:00,16:30-24:00; Sa-Su 00:00-24:00

And the metered lots are:

access=public fee=yes @ Mo-Fr 07:00-16:30

townlands.ie - for all your townland needs

Posted by rorym on 7 July 2014 in English (English)

I've moved the townlands web application to: http://www.townlands.ie/

The source code is on github: https://github.com/rory/osm-irish-townlands/

Feel free to request new features or report problems via github's 'issues': https://github.com/rory/osm-irish-townlands/issues?state=open

OSM for Nagpur and Mumbai, India

Posted by 6simplex on 7 July 2014 in English (English)

hey all,

We are a young GIS development organization and have begun further densifying Nagpur and Mumbai cities in India, for our own and the mapping community benefit.

The idea is to spend about an hour or so on a daily basis adding markers for major city areas first, then digging into each area and identifying landmarks (mostly used for providing verbal directions in India, notorious for lack of a systematic address format) and streets. The hope is that folks and our devs will be able to build on this to provide geocoding (using opensource geocoding engines such as OpenCage Geocoders that use OSM) in our mapping apps.

Why Nagpur? Its a so called tier 2 city in India. Tier 1 cities are those like Mumbai, New Delhi, Chennai etc with bigger economies and tech industries. Nagpur is growing in all these areas too, and with good and developing infrastructure, is fast becoming prominent on the investment map. Its also my hometown ;-)

We are of course looking for volunteers from various other cities in India, to chip in during their free time. You know, when you are watching that game on TV and if side by side you could also identify some well known spots in your neighborhood or your city on OSM, that'd help everyone a great deal.

Thanks and have a great time! Ajit

Location: NH47;53, Nagpur, Maharashtra, 440001, India

New Ottawa Mappers Website

Posted by spatialfrog on 6 July 2014 in English (English)

I've created a new static web page based on GitHub pages for the local Ottawa mappers community here.

My intention with this to make it easier for local folks to connect with the local mapping parties as well as a handy resource.

Let me know what you think! Pull requests to improve or other ideas are always welcome:)

Cheers,

Richard

Location: Lincoln Heights, Britannia Bay, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Mapping at Mweva computer Centre in Jinja-Bamwese Mansoor

Posted by BamweseMansoor on 6 July 2014 in English (English)

We hope to map all areas in Uganda but lots of challenges are on our necks and these include lack of enough resources to use during our mapping sessions and these include the gps devices,computers and cameras for capturing information during the process

improper tags

Posted by Warin61 on 6 July 2014 in English (English)

A Comment from BlueTiger on 3 July 2014 at 14:14 in another entry; " Most of the times when I travel I will leave the OSMTracker running and update new POIs. At times I have skipped uploading POIs as they don't have proper tags in OSM. Unfortunately I have taken a bad choice here, I should have updated them anyway and requested for new tags."

I've seen a few tags that were not "proper" in an OSM sense .. but they make sense if you know what is there. Unfortunately getting somethings in to be "proper" in OSM looks to me to be difficult due to the numbers and location game e.g. Radio Telescope. While other things that are not consistent get through - e.g. highway=footpath and highway=path. So I'm inclined to tag all things I consider important in either a navigational sense or a facility. Make a tag note= with some explanation if necessary. This way the data is there .. even if used at this time. I'd rather have the data recorded rather than thrown away. The "improper" tag can be changed latter if a more appropriate tag is available.

Evolution of TIGER Data in OpenStreetMap US

Posted by dalek2point3 on 6 July 2014 in English (English)

NOTE: This post is mostly for my reference, might not make a lot of sense for other folks -- but thought I'd put this out there in case you're interested in the intricacies of TIGER data in the US.

Quick post to highlight some charts as I'm doing research on this topic:

  • Number of ways with a highway tag, and counting a way as one using unique "name" tags. TIGER counties are the ones that complete "good" TIGER data, while control counties are those that got missing TIGER data.

Imgur

  • Same chart, but only for highway class = 1 (i.e. motorway and trunk). Seems like someone added a lot of new class 1 highways in 2010q4

Imgur

  • Same chart, but only for highway class = 4 (i.e. cycleways etc). Note that TIGER was not a source for many highways of this type. Note how the control regions got a spike while the TIGER regions did not.

Imgur

  • Same chart, but only for highway class = 3 (i.e. residential / tertiary etc).

Imgur

Location: East Cambridge, Cambridge, Middlesex, Massachusetts, 02142, United States of America

What to do today? (It's too wet to go out mapping!)

Posted by NZGraham on 5 July 2014 in English (English)

How about reading the local newspaper – especially the business pages – for information useful for updating existing OSM data or preparing a 'To Do' list for when the weather improves.

Examples are:- 1. New shops/businesses opening up or old ones closing down. 2. Perhaps a new building project has just got underway. 3. Who has just moved to new premises? 4. What is happening to that vacant site I noticed the other day? 5. New section of highway opened. 6. Developers advertising sections for sale on new housing subdivisions.

For building sites (tag 'landuse=construction') here are a couple of useful pages from the wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dconstruction http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date – a future date can be entered to indicate when construction is due to finish. Might be a good idea to make a diary note around that date to check on progress so that a further update can be made.

Another 'wet day' project could be to select a local area and, if you have decent Bing imagery, add building outlines to the map. Select just a block or so and use a bit of caution combined with your local knowledge in case things have changed since the area was photographed. You are then all set to go out on a fine day and gather 'on the ground' details for all these buildings.

Finally, if you use JOSM as your editor, I highly recommend installing the 'Opening Hours' plugin. Once you have checked businesses opening hours on the web you can use this plugin to add the info to the OSM data. It makes a seemingly tedious task so simple.

Which camera for capturing 'Street View'?

Posted by mvexel on 4 July 2014 in English (English)

I have been following Mapillary with a good deal of interest, because they provide an open 'street view' platform that is explicitly aimed at improving OpenStreetMap.

Here's an example of a Mapillary image and map context:

example

I have created an account and did some test shooting from my car, using the iPhone app Mapillary provides. This is OK, but I want better quality images. So I am looking at an action camera I can mount in my car and on my bike.

After doing some research, I narrowed the field down to two contenders: the Garmin VIRB / VIRB Elite and the GoPro Hero 3.

The Garmin VIRB (Elite edition shown): VIRB

The GoPro Hero3 (White shown): GoPro Hero3

Some observations:

  • The VIRB seems to have better battery life (important! but could not find any side by side comparisons)
  • The basic GoPro Hero3 is less expensive than the basic VIRB
  • The Elite edition of the Garmin VIRB has lots of built in sensors: GPS, altimeter, accelerometer - nice, but I am already carrying a GPS wherever I go anyway.
  • Both can do automatic time lapse photos at set intervals, which is crucial.
  • The VIRB can do 16MP stills, the most expensive Hero3 can do 12MP. This does not necessarily mean better pictures, of course.
  • The most expensive Hero3 comes with a remote, which can be convenient if you don't want to time-lapse. For example on long freeway drives where you just want to capture the signs. The VIRB can be remote controlled by certain Garmin devices like the Fenix 2 watch. Both come with smartphone apps that can control the camera as well. Convenience factor is much less though.
  • The VIRB has a built in screen. Not sure if that is actually an advantage. What would you use it for?
  • Both have wide angle lenses which is important to capture as much in one shot as possible. Specs are sketchy but it looks like the GoPros have a slightly wider angle.
  • GoPro has been at this for a lot longer than Garmin.

Here's a comparison of the video side by side. I wouldn't use video mode as much so this is of limited value, but anyway:

(The iframe embedding does not seem to work - is there a way?)

From what I can see the GoPro wins out by a small margin: sharper and better colors.

What do you use? Any other cameras to consider?

Complex Intersections, or Why We Should Get Rid Of exit_to

Posted by mvexel on 3 July 2014 in English (English)

Here in the U.S., we have been using the convention of tagging exit information on the highway=junction node using the poorly documented exit_to tag. The rest of the world has been using destination=, and now that I start to think about this problem more, I can see why.

Let's take this example of the junction of I-70 and the Baltimore beltway I-695.

Example situation

(Have you used Mapillary? It's pretty awesome and unlike Google Streetview, OpenStreetMap explicitly does have permission to map from the images. It's pretty easy and fun to contribute your own, too.)

How to tag this so that navigation and other software could make sense of it?

Currently, the only relevant tags on the junction node are ref:left=91B and ref:right=91A indicating the exit / junction numbers. There is nothing on the `_link' ways to indicate destination.

tags

One way I have seen people map this information in the US is roughly exit_to:left=I 695 N;New York;Towson and exit_to:right=I 695 S;Baltimore;Glen Burnie. This is not great for a number of reasons:

  1. There is no way to distinguish the ref information (I 695 S etc) from the names reliably.
  2. The US seems to be the only jurisdiction where exit_to on the junction node is used, the rest of the world uses destination= on the _link ways.

If we were to adopt destination= in the US like everywhere else, most of the signpost information would be on the _link ways after the junction node. Here is the situation in OSM:

situation

The (first part of the) top way is 11830056. The bottom way is 11830053.

According to the destination documentation, the first way would get destination=New York;Towson and the second way would get destination=Baltimore;Glen Burnie.

So far so good. But there's a few pieces of information that are not captured yet:

1) The exit (junction) numbers 91A and 91B. Oh wait - these were already on the junction node as ref:left=91B and ref:right=91A. This works, but intuitively it would make more sense to have this information on the _link ways as well. I am not sure how and the wiki does not give any guidance. (Actually it suggests using ref on the junction node for exit numbers.) 2) The road numbers the exits connect to, in this case I-695 N/S, leading to I-95 N/S. destination:ref seems to be used for that quite a bit. That would work for I-695 but I don't know how to capture the connection to I-95. destination:ref:to?

Following the documentation as best I can, this is what I come up with for the highlighted _link ways:

first tags

second tags

I think this system makes more sense than the exit_to convention that is poorly documented, doesn't scale well to cover complex cases, and is used nowhere else in the world. The only good reason I can think of why people use it is because it's used much more (about 18,000 times) than destination= in the U.S. Elsewhere, from what I can see in TagInfo, destination= is more popular.

JOSM 7287 released

Posted by don-vip on 3 July 2014 in English (English)

The June version of JOSM is now available (a bit late) as version 7287 :)

This version brings some technical enhancements and a lot of bugfixes, here's the changelog:

Notable changes

major changes/enhancements

  • Extrude action: add dual alignment mode
  • Automatic reloading of local map paint styles and validator rules on file change
  • Automatic update for imagery entries using id

minor enhancements

  • Allow setting shortcut for Move Node to Way
  • Mac OSX: register JOSM package as .osm files editor
  • Remote Control:
    • allow it to work from osm.org in https on Windows by installing JOSM certificate
    • allow to select objects by a search expression in load_and_zoom/zoom handlers
  • MapCSS:
    • add right- and left-hand traffic database, update roundabout icons (new pseudo-class-condition :righthandtraffic)
    • add number_of_tags expression to get number of tags, print and println to show debugging output
  • Presets/Map styles:
    • use of new leaf_type and leaf_cycle keys in presets, deprecate old wood and type values
    • add highway=elevator
    • better rendering of bridges, tunnels, highways, cycleways, turning circles

Summarized changelog

Complete changelog

Milestone view (need login)

Cheers, Vincent

how a bad query can get you working for 2 days

Posted by baditaflorin on 3 July 2014 in English (English)

i was using this into the overpass api

[timeout:86400]; (way(34.759984,-12.216797,71.587596,36.298828)[shop];); out meta;

instead of

[timeout:86400]; (way(34.759984,-12.216797,71.587596,36.298828)[shop];); /*added by auto repair*/ (._;>;); /*end of auto repair*/ out meta;

The Missing Mappers Problem?

Posted by dalek2point3 on 2 July 2014 in English (English)

While playing around with the changeset data I noticed an interesting pattern. There were some users who had made a lot of contributions to the map, who were nowhere to be seen. A lot of the talk in the community has been on attracting new mappers, but if we're losing existing mappers that is surely a problem, no?

Wondering if this was a big problem, I decided to dig in. Here is what I found -- it doesnt seem to be a HUGE problem at the very top, but there are many mappers who make 10 or 100 changesets that never come back. Note that this is only using data from the USA at the moment.

missingmappers

First thing to notice is the blue line -- these are how many users there are for a minimum number of changesets. 44k users have more than zero changesets, 25k have more than one changeset, 100k have more than 5 changesets and so on. There are only about 273 who have more than 1000 changesets, and I've done my best to get rid of imports so these are likely to be real people, but Im sure a few of these include imports.

Now, how many of these users seem to be lost from OSM? The Orange, Yello and Green bars plot number of users who have not made a single edit within the US in since 2012, 2011 and 2010 respectively. So, for example, looking at the extreme right, of the 273 users who made at least 1000 changesets, 22 have not been seen since 2012, 12 since 2011 and 4 since 2010. The problem is a little bit more acute if you looked at those who made at least 500 changesets. Of this group, about 50 have not been seen since 2012.

Who are these users? And why did we lose them? Was it due to contributor terms or is it just bots which are no longer being deployed?

Here is the list of the top missing mappers that I could find in my data, heavy mapper that have not been seen since 2012! Chime in, in the comments if you have any theories about where these lost souls might be and what we can do to bring them back!

Here at the top 10 users who have at least 500 changesets and have not been since since 2012:

list

Click here to check out the full list!

Location: Charles River Reservation, Cambridge, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, 02163, United States of America

Weekly OpenStreetMap Task

Posted by AndiG88 on 2 July 2014 in English (English)

The German OSM Blog just kicked off its 2nd weekly task (Wochenaufgabe). The goal is to encourage mappers to tag a certain POIs during that period.

The first task was to tag bicycle tube vending machines. Over the next two weeks (community wanted a bit more time) we want to improve the coverage of electric charging stations.

In created a Wiki page to keep track of the tasks and make it easier for non-German mappers to take part:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wochenaufgabe

Moutainbike Orienteering map rendering ruleset for Maperitive (OSM)

Posted by hadry on 2 July 2014 in English (English)

The OpenStreetMap database is particularly suited to create MTB Orienteering maps (unlike foot orienteering, pretty much everything needed for MTB'O is standard mapping in OSM, at least for recreational and training purposes).

Ruleset, icons, and scripts here: https://github.com/hdevillepoix/OSM-MTBO-Maperitive Please submit suggestions on github project.

Orival MTBO

Web version - mobile version - how long does it take?

Posted by Francois555 on 2 July 2014 in English (English)

Does anyone have an idea how long it takes to move data from the web version of OSM to mobile version (Maps with me)? I have been updating in several countries lately and I cant wait to see my changes in Maps with me! I has been at least three months since the first edit.

Cheers from Italy! (Im updating Perugia now:-)

OSM roads nodes density

Posted by baditaflorin on 1 July 2014 in English (English)

I made some visualizations of the nodes density of roads in OpenStreetMap

For Romania, there where 379.445 ways that generated over 4.7 milions points that where counted in a grid of over 31000 polygons , with area between 7.43 square kilometers to 8.08 square kilometers

Zoom Out - 14000x9900 pixels Alt text Middle zoom Alt text Close zoom Alt text

2048 OpenStreetMap style density map Alt text Glitchy OpenStreetMap density style map Alt text

All the images can be downloaded from my Dropbox public folder https://www.dropbox.com/sh/qpgi10q3b62s5c0/AADN0qUyY9x3bNsHQlD0NRB5a?lst

This would not be possible to made in old QGIS 2.2, 2,0 it would have taken 10 times more time. Big thanks for all the dev that are mentaining and improving QGIS

OpenStreetMap Romania

Trace from Florida Ave to Eastwood

Posted by gnumen on 30 June 2014 in English (English)

We walked all the way to Eastwood more than once but this time I took my GTA02 with me to trace the path - from Marsden Rd -> Lawson St -> Brush Rd -> Rutledge Rd -> Eastwood. The usual process of downloading/cache the maps using wifi which required SD card (http://gnumen.org/blog/foss/31/03/2011/gps-tracing-using-gta02-u-blox-atr0635-module) went without any glitch. The maps were downloaded using the wifi WPA2(AES). In order to overcome the MAC based pass thru for captive portal of Pfsense entered the MAC addr of netgear in the Pass thru MAC table( risk, I know). BUT when ever the gps is enabled, the GTA02 almost within seconds alarms about low battery which wasn't the case previously but this time only difference that I found was that after every reboot I was not made to configure the SD card and the SD card retained the previous gps traces as well as the map cache(s).. Hmmmm should I call it usual or unusual. I took care of the low battery issue with the Sony cycleenergy Power bank. Don't know why it's behaving in such a manner. ##Some random observation(s)/steps taken - In the flight without the SIM card was able to trace without the battery outage alert for quiet sometime. - After reaching Florida ave the device was not able to retain the battery power even for a day. without GSM sim or any other services disabled. - Placed the sim and replaced the SD card once again.

We came back from Eastwood by Public transport system(BUS) - from Eastwood -> HillView Rd -> Terry Rd -> Marsden Rd

New MapRoulette Challenge: Crossing Ways

Posted by mvexel on 30 June 2014 in English (English)

We created a new MapRoulette challenge over at Telenav: Crossing Ways. As always with the Telenav-generated challenges, this one is US only, because we currently only process OpenStreetMap data for the United States. We are working on extending support for other regions.

TL;DR --> On to MapRoulette!!

The Crossing Ways challenge is pretty straightforward and should make for an easy challenge for novice mappers looking for something to fix. It detects ways that cross, but neither way is tagged as a bridge or tunnel. Here is an example:

Example from MapRoulette

If you open this up in iD or JOSM, you will be able to tell the required resolution from the aerial imagery:

in JOSM

In this case, the ways should be connected as there is clearly an intersection. Another possibility is that there actually should be a bridge or tunnel tag on either of the ways.

In this particular case, you can see that there actually is a node at the intersection, but it does not connect both ways. In JOSM, it displays as a 'skinny node':

Skinny node in JOSM.

In this case, you can use JOSM's 'Join' function (shortcut 'J') to connect both ways. In iD, a node connecting two ways will be grey, and a regular node will be white:

Nodes in iD

If you use iD, you can just drag an existing node to the intersection to snap the two ways together, or drag a virtual node to the intersection to create a new intersection node. (Virtual nodes appear between two existing nodes and allow you to quickly create a new node on a way, an example shown below.)

virtual node in iD

There are currently around 19,000 cases in the US alone, so let's get on fixing these annoying bugs in OSM!

On to MapRoulette!

Older Entries | Newer Entries