One other thing - the cycleway further south at way/1028660923 currently doesn't actually join Terminus Road. Presumably it does, so that routers can understand that you can get from one to the other?

Hello, a quick question about the cycleway here. Currently way/763299425 doesn't actually join Terminus Road (you can see that at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1fQD ) but a couple of days ago it did: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1fQE .
If you're cycling along NAtional Cycle Route 2 here, where does it actually join? relation/13725899#map=19/50.89742/-1.39740
Best Regards,
Andy

Looks updated to me. Maybe it's cached in your local browser?

Lower zoom levels might take a while to filter through, but higher zoom levels should update immediately.

Thanks. What other app was it that you were trying to get it into? Maybe we could work with them so that no-one feels to do this in the future.

Hola Marczoutenberg y bienvenido a OpenStreetMap,
Parece que este conjunto de cambios o uno anterior podría haber causado una pequeña brecha en el límite aquí; puede verlo en relation/5441968#map=10/27.5685/-8.8509 actualmente ( aunque estoy seguro de que se arreglará pronto).
¿Cuál fue el cambio que en realidad estabas tratando de hacer aquí?
Atentamente,
Andy

Hello Marczoutenberg and welcome to OpenStreetMap,
It looks like this changeset or a previous might have caused a bit of a gap in the boundary here - you can see that at relation/5441968#map=10/27.5685/-8.8509 currently (although I'm sure that will get fixed soon).
What was the change that you were actually trying to make here?
Best Regards,
Andy

Edit was fact-checked by someone with local knowledge(!)

The source here was "the only way to get from A to B" using the cycleway through the building works that someone's already mapped.

Hello g1750,
You've changed the road here from a secondary to a residential here - has the classification really changed?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I'm not sure what way/1008076447 is here - I can't see a service road going around the edge of the car park here?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello jaywhyenecks,
I'm trying to understand why you've added way/945676607 etc. here as buildings. Was it just an accident or was there some set of instructions that you were following that suggested that you added a building here?
Best Regards
Andy

What happens if you tap "Report a problem with the map"?

What _exact message_ does Instagram give you?

However, while it isn't "wrong" to tag bicycle=no on foot-only infrastructure such as highway=footway it's generally been thought to be unnecessary.
I suspect - and I'd like to be proved wrong on this - is that someone's adding "bicycle=yes" (and "highway=cycleway") to things that really aren't, because they want to cycle there.

Where it isn't clear, I'd agree - I certainly tag foot and horse access as explicitly "yes" on public bridleways because an app developer in Germany or the US isn't going to understand the "designation=public_bridleway" tag. However, I think I actually tag such specific access more than most people do.

You will need to contact Facebook about that. Their "places" data does not come from OpenStreetMap.

Hello Andy Parton and welcome to OpenStreetMap,
Please don't just use the changeset comment "Solar Mountain Gaming - Golf Edits" every time - in more detail what you are actually doing. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for details.
Best Regards,
Andy

I don't know what the norm for cycling signage is in Warrington (haven't been there since the 80s) but if it's a cycleway I'd expect something like a blue "cycling" sign - maybe https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/55ba1284e5274a1521000023/sign-giving-order-route-pedal-cycles-only.jpg or https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/55ba12b1ed915d155c00001d/sign-giving-order-segregated-cycle-pedestrian-route.jpg , or some tactile paving that says ""cycleway" such as https://www.marshalls.co.uk/commercial/product/tactile-cycleway-unit, or something from the council that says (even if they haven't put up any signage) that they consider it a cycleway. Without any of those it's just a footpath.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Clearly there's an edit war going on over https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/30765899 etc.
Perhaps you could _both_ post evidence of why you think it is a cycleway or not a cycleway - maybe photographs would help?
Best Regards,
Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)

(on cycling across pedestrian crossings) the Highway Code's very clear that you shouldn't: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/rules-for-cyclists-59-to-82 . That also means that it's not normally necessary to explicitly tag bicycle=no on every pedestrian or equestrian crossing (not that you likely have many of the latter in Warrington)
Regards,
Andy