"6142525 | Dromlohan" and "6142519 | Currahchase North" both fell out of the database last night. I deleted the spur in changeset/184248797 and both now look OK in Josm's validator.

Usual problem - townland etc. breakage - fixed in changeset/184053304 .

For the signage of this, see node/13932273615/history .

node/13205653012 seems to be a duplicate of way/775843296#map=22/27.6985323/-80.9006044&layers=V . Can you please tidy up after yourself?

Hello Jonas Hansen, You've set the source here to "Citypedia". Is that really the source (as opposed to the app used to add the data) and if so what is the licence associated with it?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Halo WarmedCord207,
Silakan kirim email ke data@openstreetmap.org dengan subjek "[Ticket#2026061110000811] WarmedCord207" yang menjelaskan sumber informasi Anda tentang bundaran ini.
Salam Hormat,
Andy Townsend, atas nama Kelompok Kerja Data OSM.

Hello WarmedCord207,
Please email data@openstreetmap.org with a subject line of "[Ticket#2026061110000811] WarmedCord207" explaining what your source for this roundabout was.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Just for info, I've filled in a couple of gaps in http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=17295022 here...

Looks like the coastline was fixed in changeset/183815605 - is it OK now?

Hello TsuriBY, and welcome to OSM!
You've said in the changeset description "Corrected English name", but that's not actually what you actually did; I'm guessing that the gnome-maps UI doesn't make it clear what language you're editing.
https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/node/280680120 shows the name in various languages.
The English name has been "Ein Hawd" for about 5 years; I'm guessing that your "Ein-Hod" was just a transliteration difference?
Best Regards,
Andy
PS: Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask!

Hello,
What was the source of your change here? Looking at the history node/12749774034/history , it was originally mapped as "shop=fish", changed by someone remotely without survey, and changed back following a complaint to the DWG.
If you've been there and verified that "shop=seafood" really is correct here then obviously that's fine, but if not mechanical changes really do need to go through osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct . There are exceptions - something like "shop=pirmary" can be changed to "shop=primary" because it's obvious what was meant.
Changing "fish" to "seafood" may also be somewhat problematic because a "fish shop" in many parts of the UK is colloquially a fish and chip shop.
An image search https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ftsa&q=fish+shop+glasgow&ia=images&iax=images for "fish shop glasgow" returns mostly fish and chips, a fishmonger and also an aquatics shop!
Best Regards,
Andy

Looks like this introduced a gap in the Cotswold Way. I've filled in the gap in changeset/183521302 .

I've re-added the missing bit to the Sussex Ouse Valley Way - see changeset/183453260 . Does this look OK?

Hello Pernycek,
Ignoring Google Maps (Which we cannot use) and wikidata (usually likewise, for different reasons), what is your source for your edit here?
Best Regards,
Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)

Ah - I see a comment on changeset/182785531 explaining the signage.

Powiedziałeś „przywróć błędną edycję kierunkową”, ale nie powiedziałeś, skąd to wiesz. Poprzedni redaktor powiedział: „Ulica Lubartowska jest dwukierunkowa na całej swojej długości”.
Bez żadnych konkretnych dowodów skończymy na wojnach edycyjnych w nieskończoność, takich jak https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/230504488.
Proszę, wyjaśnij, dlaczego masz rację, a drugi maper się myli.

You've said "revert incorrect directionality editing" but have not said how you know that. The previous editor said "Lubartowska Street is two-way along its entire length."
Without any actual evidence we'll end up with edit wars ad infinitum like https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/230504488 .
Please explain why you are right and the other mapper is wrong.

@Vojtěch Fošnár what is "sync dev"? If you're importing data into OSM you must follow osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines .

Hello,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here (we've been made aware of this discussion).
Outside the DWG I've spent quite a lot of time looking at what OSM tags are used with what other OSM tags. "attraction=animal" on an animal enclosure within a zoo doesn't usually have a "tourism=attraction" tag.
If you look at the tags that occur with "attraction=animal" https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/attraction=animal#combinations you can see that "tourism=attraction" is used in only a third of cases.
Quite a few of those are "standalone" animal attractions like node/6611980233 , not within zoos at all.
I'd actually suggest the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/ as the best way to discuss this sort of thing.
Best Regards,
Andy

It looks like this edit broke a couple of cycle routes - see e.g. relation/11017#map=20/57.3458154/-4.0042718 .
Also, is way/37121135 really access=no currently?