Witaj maraf24,
Jaki właściwie jest plan dróg? Zdjęcia lotnicze pokazują, jak wygląda duży obszar budowy.
Z poważaniem,
Andy Townsend, w imieniu Grupy Roboczej ds. Danych OSM.

Hello maraf24,
What actually is the plan for the roads? Aerial imagery shows what looks to be a large construction area.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

@Hotel Gaj Kesri - when you say "it is showing" - in what map or app is it showing in the wrong place?

Thanks - fixed.

For info see osm.org/user_blocks/5638

For info see osm.org/user_blocks/5638

For info see osm.org/user_blocks/5638

Specifically this deals with these revert fails from the complex_revert:
cannot restore relation/5640784 to version 159 (put): 409 Conflict
cannot delete way/1023961261: 412 Precondition Failed
cannot delete way/1023961260: 412 Precondition Failed
cannot delete way/1023961262: 412 Precondition Failed
cannot delete node/9442424147: 412 Precondition Failed
cannot delete node/9442424139: 412 Precondition Failed
cannot delete node/9442424148: 412 Precondition Failed

Hello - a quick question about way/466428839 , which is highway=no presumably because there's nothing on the ground here. Should it really be part of the Norfolk Coast Path and the England Coast Path, and (a bit of a philosophical question) should it join way/466428842 which it crosses?
Best Regards,
Andy

Drop an email to data@openstreetmap.org (with a bit of info about what needs changing back to what) if you'd need us to help figure something out.
Cheers - Andy

Hello,
The Esri imagery is offset here. I've moved node/7242362789 etc. to match GPS and OS StreetView-aligned Bing.

Thanks

Hello MicronationMarker,
OpenStreetMap is not a place for fictional or imaginary countries. As you can see at https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/11931692 , this has already been tidied up, just like it was last time: https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/676522134 .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.

Hello Ed,
I hope you don't mind me commenting on something that was only your 5th edit almost a year ago!
In this changeset you changed a few "highway=bridleway" in the New Forest to "bicycle=permissive". While it's true that there are permissive cycle routes in the New Forest (see for example https://www.newforestnpa.gov.uk/app/uploads/2018/01/New-Forest-Cycle-Routes-Map.pdf from the park authority), bridleways in the New Forest aren't like "public bridleways" elsewhere in that there isn't an automatic right to cycle on them. OSM has the tag "designation=public_bridleway" for "public bridleways", but there are almost none of those in the New Forest. Following advice from Forestry England I've changed the remaining ones in thhis changeset from bicycle=permissive to bicycle=no.
If you've got any questions by all means please ask, but don't worry - I'm not asking you to do anything, just letting your know for information.
Best Regards,
Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)

OSM's Data Working Group had a report that a number of bridleways in the New Forest had "bicycle=permissive" set on them in error. What seems to have happened is that someone assumed that they are actually public bridleways ("designation=public_bridleway" in OSM, where a cyclist would have legal rights) rather than merely "highway=bridleway" - something designed for use by horses.
There are almost no "designation=public_bridleway" in the New Forest, but here are some routes where foot and horse traffic has legal rights, and some permissive cycling routes..

Hello,
I wonder if you had any idea - if this bit of NCN13 relation/9765637#map=17/52.07895/0.72564 runs down way/120452353 does that mean it doesn't run down the parallel road to the north?
Best Regards,
Andy

Γεια σου G626,
Andy από την Ομάδα Εργασίας Δεδομένων του OSM εδώ. Εκτός από την ερώτηση για το A26, έχετε διαγράψει πάρα πολλούς τρόπους και σχέσεις σε αυτήν την αλλαγή. Ίσως αυτό έγινε κατά λάθος; Αν ναι, μπορούμε να αναιρέσουμε αυτήν την αλλαγή.
Επίσης, χρησιμοποιήστε μια καλύτερη περιγραφή κάθε φορά που κάνετε μια αλλαγή στο OpenStreetMap και όχι απλώς "ενημέρωση".
Τις καλύτερες ευχές,
Άντι

Hello G626,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here. In addition to the question about the A26, you've deleted an awful lot of ways and relations in this change. Perhaps that was by mistake? If so, we can undo this change.
Also, please do use a better description whenever you make a change to OpenStreetMap rather than just "update".
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello JRClements and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I'm not sure exactly what happened, but a gap appeared in the South West Coast Path here around relation/2375987#map=19/50.36111/-4.30047 . I've filled it in based on the Bing imagery - hope that's OK.
Andy questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy

Here's the net change (in number of pieces in postgres) after this:

Change in relation components for NCN1_R3 9579
3c3
< 105
---
> 122
relation/9579
http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=9579