OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
73694919 over 1 year ago

Hello,
What you've called the Doncaster Bypass here is not signed as that.
In my recollection (driving it for 40 years or so) it never has been.
Best Regards,
Andy

142890224 over 1 year ago

X is inaccessible to anyone and the two press articles will just be regurgitating press releases from the MOD, which leaves a couple of recent (post 2009) documents from them. Even https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63ca9693d3bf7f24b35c0f32/FOI2022-09171.pdf , despite looking like something from the 1970s, is dated 2021.
My guess is that someone there got confused and "Towthorpe Lane" (as Towthorpe Moor Lane is also commonly called) got made into "Towthorpe Line" (see https://www.arrse.co.uk/wiki/5_Regt_RA , https://ffhyork.weebly.com/uploads/8/2/0/5/8205739/ordnance_depot_railway_-_historical_notes_maps_and_pictures.pdf et al).
Historically it was always just "REME" (the operators of the site before the Army medics moved in) and gets referred to that in error even recently: https://www.itv.com/news/calendar/update/2017-04-03/travel-strensall-barracks-area-north-yorks-crash/ .

156559810 over 1 year ago

Hello kvaziq, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You've added node/12174392649 here, but that seems to be within another school - way/174136303 .
Maybe they are the same one?
Best Regards,
Andy

142890224 over 1 year ago

Hello,
What's the source of the name "Army Medical Services Training Centre (Towthorpe Lines)"?
Best Regards,
Andy

139384804 over 1 year ago

Hello,
Any idea if way/1194235503/history is correct as it stands now? One of Rupert's mappers chopped it off at node/254068820 which created a gap in the AONB outer, which someone else later filled in, but originally that way was also a dismantled railway / footway, which now just abruptly stops.
Imagery suggests that the footway location is a bit far to the west and probably continues, but is far from clear.
I've no local knowledge but suspect you might have :)
Cheers,
Andy

155205011 over 1 year ago

@CAI Salò Per favore, unisciti alla discussione su https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/alpinist-routes-marked-as-footpaths/117644 . Se non lo fai, le persone non avranno ascoltato il tuo punto di vista e qualsiasi decisione presa non lo prenderà in considerazione.

155205011 over 1 year ago

@CAI Salò Please do join the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/alpinist-routes-marked-as-footpaths/117644 . If you don't, people won't have heard your point of view, and any decision reached won't take it into consideration.

156298341 over 1 year ago

@364 Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

156315167 over 1 year ago

A day after this, the relation reappeared in the list of civil parishes in the local rendering database.

156293926 over 1 year ago

Re " I've opened up a topic" you've actually resurrected a topic from the old forum from 8 years ago!
I've asked the UK c.osm.org moderators to move it to its own new topic.

156293926 over 1 year ago

Hello Rupert,
6 days ago you were sent this message: osm.org/user_blocks/16645 . You appear to be ignoring it. In this changeset (with comment "#hotosm-project-17514 #cydnerthedd #resilience #GreenWales added buildings") you appear to be carrying on the same activity. Can you please explain what you're actually trying to do? One thing that I can see is, despite the "added buildings" comment, you have not added any buildings here.
I'd suggest creating a new topic at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/uk/86 to explain.
Best Regards,
Andy

153323156 over 1 year ago

Edited at changeset/156354917 .

153323156 over 1 year ago

What was the source of the wikidata item? It just looks like bot-created garbage: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q24661403&action=history .
The locality in OSM is also rubbish; it looks like the source is OS OpenData and it's actually the name of the adjacent farm, not a separate locality.
The alleged castle site (which "people on the Internet" claim probably isn't one) is apparently what OSM has as "Flat Cop" to the north.

156191975 over 1 year ago

Hello Jason Suggs, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
From the imagery, it looks like way/9009584 continues to the east of Mimsville. I appreciate that you've said "... They will be re-drawn ..." but (a) you've not done that and (b) that isn't normally the way that updates are added to OpenStreetMap - typically people would update what's already there rather than just deleting it.
If you've got any questions, I suggest that you ask in the US forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/us/78 .
Best Regards,
Andy

156298341 over 1 year ago

Hello 364,
Can you explain why you deleted them?
Best Regards,
Andy

156288962 over 1 year ago

Maybe try https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#16/51.6992/-0.0119/H which might do a better job of showing former buildings etc.?

156251795 over 1 year ago

Please don't add things that no longer exist to OpenStreetMap!
OSM is a map of how things are now, not things that have been demolished.

148858813 over 1 year ago

For info, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/problematic-access-changes-by-microsoft-mappers-in-the-uk/117945/6 .

156183488 over 1 year ago

مرحبًا،
ماذا يعني "988" هنا؟
مع أطيب التحيات،
آندي

156183488 over 1 year ago

Hello,
What does "988" mean here?
Best Regards,
Andy