Hi there,

This changeset has a lot of different stuff, most good but also some mistakes/damage to existing things. First change and everyone gets carried away sometimes... so all good!

School buildings, Vic hospital tagging, Bing use for geometry (use CT / ESRI maps for far better), Die Oog's park duplicate + damaged nodes. Redundant name tags etc.

Chances are this will be easier to fix by reverting it and making the changes in smaller cleaner chunks.

Shout if you need help or require review of smaller changes.

Hi PDTJ,

Always happy to see the foot network improved... but I know a number of these areas and there are no paths, formal or informal...?

What are you basing this work on?

Hi there and thanks for the change!

For the requested review: The road portion was all fine. Not sure if they should really be residential roads or not, but seems fine for the area.

The park should likely just be a playground with no name (unless it has a name!). You can add a description/ages/access if needed too.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96929321

Hey Basil, thanks for the change!

I'm pretty sure I've double checked this name in the past two years and it was just "Highway", I'll be in the area in the next while, so this note is to remind me too.

If you have local knowledge/live there etc, then I trust you and the rest of the change is correct :)

Thanks again!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95341531

Hey there and thanks for all these great changes all around CT.

This change seems incorrect; If I understand these buildings are now all in use by the Haven Night Shelter. However as you have tagged it, each buildings is named HNS, and has the same housenumber etc (even if the HNS has a single contact, chances are they all have different numbers).

So to rectify, I'd remove all the HNS tags from the buildings, then make a new node with all of those details, centrally located. Alternatively you can map an area enclosing the building, parking etc and give that the details.

(The change also made the buildings less square, which seems unintentional, squaring multiple areas at once can be tricky and depends on editor!)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98026567

To help review, this may help: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?relations=true&changeset=98034546

Thanks again!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98034546

Hi Ben,

Your description of this change is poor. 76% accurate?
The clinic area that you have mapped is not visible on any photography set, please do not add estimates of things, the buildings seem obviously incorrect.
I can see that the clinic was mis-placed where a substation is, but you have not named/detailed the new one at all.
Having those issues, do we then doubt the rest of your changes? Hopefully the deleted places are in fact gone? Please review it sometime!

Shout if you need some help, think you got into a mess with the web editor, so maybe just start fresh or check out some tutorials/wiki pages... totally understand that you're helping, so no biggie :)
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98034546

Review:
Errors: This place already exists. Your place/node was poorly placed in the parking lot.
Less wrong: When adding places like this, please consider adding phone numbers and opening times/addresses if you have the time :)

Other than that, thanks for at least making a change and asking for a review!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98164771

Review as requested: I think it's a fair compromise, usually I'd say just change the service-way to no access and put a barrier node on that, but in this case I think deletion is fine.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98163721

A bunch of bad geometry and tagging in this change (#adt)

This is a bad edit (mostly just redundant and certainly not a giant building)

This changeset is 95% needless changes to road geometry which degrades its quality (you are mapping how cars drive, not "what is on the ground" as OSM editing should be). Just reporting this for #adt purposes.
(Your editing on the whole seems fine; Just adding curves to roads where they are not there is... not what we're here for.)

This change has a bunch of errors; Most of it is needless changes to road geometry which degrades its quality (you are mapping how cars drive, not "what is on the ground" as OSM editing should be). Just reporting this for #adt purposes.

Hey there,
Thanks for requesting a review!
The change looks good, all that was done was change the speed limit in the close (60->10), which was done correctly.
Thanks again!

Hi there,
This changeset and a few in the same area around this time contain many errors to do with service roads. You have mapped walking paths and private driveways as service ways. A few badly connected where the sat map was not easy to read.

I'm gonna side with you, far more local eye :) I just see it when driving past these days.

Maybe we go with a pedestrian area thing, since it is an area with odd features and the area would help define it. Will give it a ponder in the next while.

(Lived along Huggon like 10 years ago; Thought the sidewalk that went along Grove connected through in a straight line towards the Bowwood+Cavendish intersection. Think your path is far better for the general case!)

Quite a few errors in this changset. In specific Dennekamp's accessways are marked as residential roads here, making routing issues.

I have been reviewing your changesets from this area a few months ago, the tagging is poor and inconsistent. Needs access tagging corrections and addition of gates and such to be worth it. Some residential roads you have added are private serviceways.

These 'services ways' are single household private driveways. You have also mapped private single house driveways as residential roads nearby.

These residential roads should just be access ways.