Quite possibly, yes.

English is fine on the Dutch forum as well, pretty much all Dutch people speak it unlike German.

I fixed self-intersections, but user vnsnt deleted the relation with natural=wood in changeset/51524321, see:

changeset/51524321

You need to revert this changeset if you want to restore the wood.

Can you be more specific?

relation/6897261 has been deleted by another user in the mean time.

Because the metropoolregio is made up of municipalities (admin_level=8) and provinces (admin_level=4), it replaces the "plusregio" (admin_level=6).

For details of admin_levels in The Netherlands see:

boundary=administrative#11_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries

The metriopoolregio is a kind of administrative unit, but in the same way as provinces, municipalities, and cities (woonplaatsen).

Further discussion of metropoolregios should be down on the Dutch forum:

http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Please stop creating old-style multipolygons (with tags on the outer way instead of on the relation), these have been deprecated quite some time ago and will no longer by osm2pgsql 4.0.0 and other OSM tools.

See: http://area.jochentopf.com/

area:highway doesn't make much sense on a MP relation which is already an area. I've made this kind of change more often while updating old-style multipolygons.

You're welcome.

Please stop creating old-style multipolygons (with tags on the outer way instead of on the relation). These are deprecated for quite some time, and osm2pgsql 4.0.0 no longer supports them, nor do recent JOSM versions render them any more.

Please update your JOSM to the latest tested snapshot (12275) which has better validator support for old-style multipolygons, to help you prevent creating any new ones from now on.

See also: http://area.jochentopf.com/

Please stop creating old-style multipolygons (with tags on the outer way instead of on the relation).

osm2pgsql 4.0.0 has dropped support for old-style multipolygons.

You also need to update your JOSM to the latest tested snapshot which (12271) which has better validation for old-style multipolygons and doesn't render them by default any more either helping you to spot these issues before uploading.

way:309568632 heeft als tags waterway=canal bridge=yes, op basis van de luchtfoto's lijkt het echter een glijbaan en is dit waarschijnlijk een geval taggen voor de renderer, wat wel meer het geval is in dit waterpark.

The old-style multipolygon was next to these areas and I changed their tagging because landcover is not rendered. Feel free to change it back.

De mapping hier is voor verbetering vatbaar. Ga je gang zou ik zeggen.

Please stop creating old-style multipolygons (with tags on the outer way instead of on the relation). These will no longer be rendered in the near future.

You should also update your JOSM to the latest tested snapshot (12039) which no longer renders old-style multipolygons by default and has improved validation rules for area objects.

Please stop creating old-style multipolygons (with tags on the outer way instead of the relation).

These will not be rendered anymore in the near future.

Please use a separate relation for each building with an inner courtyard.

Also update your JOSM to the latest tested snapshot which no longer renders old-style multipolygons with helps prevent creating new ones.

Please don't create old-style multipolygons (with tags on the outer way instead of the relation).

Also update your JOSM to the latest tested snapshot (12039) which doesn't render old-style multipolygons any more to help prevent this issue in the future.

See also: http://area.jochentopf.com/

Please don't create old-style multipolygons (with the tags on the outer way instead of on the relation).

Also create a separate multipolygon for each building with an inner courtyard.

You also need to update your JOSM to the latest tested snapshot (12039) which no longer renders old-style multipolygons.

The tags seem to imply so, double check with satellite imagery.

There were a lot of duplicate node issues in this area. Those were fixed after the JOSM validator reported the issues before uploading the previously old-style multipolygons.

Please adjust the tags as you see fit.

The the tags from the outer way were simply moved to the relation as part of the old-style multipolygon fixing effort.

There is a lot of import data in these regions, that is for the local community to deal with.