Hello BC4FUN,
What was the source of the data that you added here, and how does it relate to node/796602147 ?
Best Regards,
Andy

See changeset/121819774 . I've followed both how things look from various imagery sources and followed a reasonable interpretation of osm.wiki/Lithuania#Roads_outside_of_cities .

Thanks - osm.org/user_blocks/6037 .

You've removed some very much still existent landscape features here!
I'm very familiar with the area here between Bootham Stray and Stamford Bridge, and the route of the old railway is still very much etched in the landscape.

Thanks

Hello,
Thanks for this. I've applied a temporary block osm.org/user_blocks/6033 and have reverting their other dubious edits in changeset/121778694 .
I'll rewrite the block message to something a bit less temporary when I've thought of something better to say...
Best Regards,
Andy (from the Data Working Group)

Hello infrastructure,
As I mentioned by email, the most recent of the comments on your changesets at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14005252 - please do reply there to understand what was the problem there. osm.org/user_blocks/6027 was revoked on the explicit understanding that you would do this.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

This is a partial revert of some changes here, and unfortunately there are a couple of rough edges, such as around node/96112132 . This was partly because some of the changesets were a mixture of fantasy and genuine improvements.
I didn't revert changeset/121740113 here because the alignment changes looked broadly OK.

> We used our brains for higher level strategic decisions, not for pin-point local technical imaginary "problems".

Exactly - and anyone using their brain here would say that a bridge on a tertiary road clearly should be tertiary.

So you're saying that you're using the "highway=secondary" key to indicate "surface=paved"? That is simply wrong.
As written, osm.wiki/Lithuania#Roads_outside_of_cities isn't necessarily a problem provided that the person following that rule uses their brain - while tertiary roads outside cities may be generally unpaved, there will _always_ be exceptions and edge cases, apply that as a hard rule is just silly.
That line was introduced to the wiki in 2010: osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Lithuania&direction=next&oldid=488532 . When things change (for example, more people will be mapping surface keys now) rules should reflect that.

> Your map does not work
Sorry - that was my fault, telling someone to look at something on a server and then doing some maintenance on that server :)
Try https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/136939797 , or even way/136939797/history , and compare with https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/377193119 .

@Tomas Straupis - https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/136939797 has been tertiary forever, but you seem to be insisting that this bridge is secondary. Can you explain why?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Hello,
Can you explain what "Update max speed from 55 mph to 60 mph based on GPS data and more current data from other map providers" means?
Most map providers' data will be licence-incompatible with OpenStreetMap, so we'll probably need to revert and redact this change..
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Also 28/05 - 29/05

I know it was ages ago, but it looks like this cased a problem with the Morocco relation.
https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/3630439 suggests that this re-added way/8692572 (Parsley Island) as an inner to relation/3630439 (Morocco).
There's a note on the Parsley Island way "Claimed by both Morocco and Spain. Neither claim recognized by other party. Since an armed conflict in 2002 between the parties, it remains unpopulated, and both sides agreed not to occupy it. Spain claims the island as part of the municipality of Ceuta."
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello Pleasant Peasant and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I've had to revert this because the deletion of
way/613380079 meant that people could travel south around Memphis but not back north again.
If you can explain in a bit more detail what you were trying to do, I'm sure we'd be able to help.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello nickvet419,
As has been mentioned elsewhere, it'd be much better if you added more detail to changeset comments. For example, without context, the comment here "fix access" and earlier "fix tag" doesn't really explain what is happening. Looking at something like https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/952403857 it is possible to see more context but it'd be much better if the changeset comment here was something like "removing access=no tag as there is no construction here any more".
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello Xpgamer,
Please don't just say "Info Added" on every changeset - try and add a few more details about what you added, and where you got the information from.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
You swapped lat and long when adding node/9756301005 and node/9756301006
Best Regards,
Andy (current holder of the OSM bucket and shovel)

(повторюючись) Я не питав вас про назву російською, а не українською, а сказав, що «окопи» («окопи») — це не справжня назва, а просто опис.
Щоб хтось інший читав, mosstreet деякий час не зможе відповісти через osm.org/user_blocks/6020 , який було створено через повторювані неописові коментарі набору змін, такі як https ://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121380936 ("разное" / "Інше"), незважаючи на те, що нас прямо просять цього не робити.