I've metioned the deletion of this in changeset/117922060

Hello,
Just wondered if the deletion of the EDs inc relation/12490411 was deliberate?
Best Regards,
Andy

Ce stade et la "piscine olympique de saint-michel" ici paraissent improbables ; si personne ne répond dans quelques jours, je les supprimerai.

Great - thanks!
I thought it was odd that these roads would be "too busy"...

Does NCN66 really stop and restart here? It used to do this: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gxH and now it does this: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gxI .
Is it one of the gaps that have been introduced as part of the "Paths for everyone" initiative? Logically I'd have expected it to use the old railway here, TBH...

A revert of where _only_ osmose was used was started in changeset/117961003 and is ongoing.
Max_Kritic is currently blocked from the API for a short time in osm.org/user_blocks/5727 for ignoring requests not to use _only_ osmose.

Oddly https://tile.openstreetmap.fr doesn't add the lines on these ones - you'd need to ask the maintainers of that what the actual rules are.

> Des corrections diverses que proposent avec Osmose.

Ce n'est pas correct. Osmose ne fait que des suggestions. Vous devez vérifier chacun d'eux à la fois pour vous assurer que ce qui est suggéré est valide. Je vois régulièrement des suggestions d'Osmose lors de l'édition avec Vespucci, et un pourcentage élevé d'entre elles (30 à 50 % localement ?) Sont des faux positifs.

Je vais devoir les annuler car nous savons déjà que vous avez commis des erreurs de base en matière de changement de langue. Si vous pouvez être plus précis sur les modifications apportées à quels ensembles de modifications, je pourrai peut-être en exclure certaines du retour.

- Andy (du DWG)

> Des corrections diverses que propose avec Osmose.

This is not OK. Osmose only makes suggestions. You need to check each one one at a time to make sure that what is being suggested is valid. I regularly see Osmose suggestions when editing with Vespucci, and a high percentage of those (30-50% locally?) are false positives.

I'll have to revert these since we already know that there were some basic language change errors made by you as a result. If you can be more specific about what changes were made in what changesets then perhaps I may be able to exclude some from the revert.

- Andy (from the DWG)

I suspect that you added the ways, and the relation, and then added _everything_ to the relation (rather than just the ways).
Everyone does that at least once :)
I'll have a look in more detail later.
I also mentioned it at https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCJ2P6KCH/p1645956747743569 (which you can get to via https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ if not already there), so someone may beat me to fixing it.

Hello,
Please don't add test data to OSM like this.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Please don't add test data to OpenStreetMap like this!
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I'm not sure what happened here, but you added some things in the middle of the Atlantic:
node/9300376426/history
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello again Mikhail1412,

As mentioned many times previously, there are still questions for you to answer at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2055614 .
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
In this changeset you've added 21516 nodes to the relation/13852718 . Presumably this was in error. Do you need help fixing it?
Best Regards,
Andy

Osmose on its own is not a source. What change did you actually make?

What source did you use for the change to way/823065235/history ?

Thanks

I've remapped this using "pitch=line" in way/1026721836 .
IF time permits later I'll try and add rendering for "pitch=line" to map.atownsend.org.uk .
An issue to discuss that at OSM's "standard" map is at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1126 , although the suggested approach there is different.

Also joined a pedestrian/bike crossing to the main road neat Kingsholm based on Bing/Maxar imagery, and trimmed off another spur in Leamington.