Hello,
I think that way/380542099 might have got extended here which added a spur to the IOW coastal path.
I've snipped it off in changeset/112953889 .
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.
For completeness, OSM's policy on names is contained in https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Policies_and_other_Documents .
Generally speaking its up to the local community to decide what's in the "name" tag, and often (as seems to be the case here) translating official guidance into OSM tags isn't straightforward. I'd suggest that a discussion involving the wider OSM NZ community is the way forward. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nz doesn't seem hugely busy, but https://openstreetmap.community/ suggests a couple of "Oceania" options too which may be worth looking at.
For completeness, http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=6411467557 shows the history of the tags on the object.
Best Regards,
Andy

way/3376262 hat immer noch "maxspeed=70mph" drauf.
Bitte entfernen Sie die Typinformationen nicht - verschieben Sie sie stattdessen nach "maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_single".
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Andy

way/3376262 still has "maxspeed=70mph" on it.
Please do not remove the type information - move it to "maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_single" instead.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
This changeset adds a role "main" to way/41609696 within relation/1581577 and relation/1959386 - I was wondering what that meant?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hallo,
Ich hoffe, es macht Ihnen nichts aus, wenn ich ein paar Fragen stelle - in diesem Änderungssatz haben Sie die Höchstgeschwindigkeit des Kreisverkehrs auf "70mph" eingestellt - das scheint auf einigen Ebenen falsch zu sein - normalerweise ist es üblich, ein Leerzeichen zwischen den Zahl und "mph" (kein großes Problem, aber der Validator von JOSM weist darauf hin).
Die andere ist, dass "70 mph" für etwas unwahrscheinlich erscheint, das zuvor UK:nsl_single (d. h. "60 mph") war?
Normalerweise, wenn etwas innerhalb eines nationalen Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungsbereichs liegt, würde ich sowohl "maxspeed=60 mph" als auch "maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_single" hinzufügen, um offensichtlich zu machen, was die tatsächliche Geschwindigkeit ist und wie sie eingestellt wird.
Abschließend noch eine Frage - was bedeutet "source:tooling" im Changeset-Tag?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Andy

Hello,
I hope you don't mind me asking a couple of questions - in this changeset you've set the maxspeed of the roundabout as "70mph" - that seems wrong on a couple of levels - normally the convention is to have a space between the number and "mph" (not a big issue, but JOSM's vaidator flags it).
The other is that 70 seems unlikely for something that was previously UK:nsl_single (i.e. 60)?
Normally when something is within a national speed limit section I'd add both "maxspeed=60 mph" and "maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_single" to make it obvious what the actually speed is and how it is set.
Finally one more question - what does "source:tooling" in the changeset tag?
Best Regards,
Andy

Northwich Community Woodlands relation/63112#map=15/53.2844/-2.5194 could do with looking at. Historically it was https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1cjl at Marbury Country Park. It's now "longer but different". Needs survey.

The source for e.g. the Marbury Country Park section is https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1cjk . Of the two routes through Lyme Valley Park at relation/63113#map=13/53.3374/-2.0451 , the eastern one is the original one, but the western one is also plausible. Needs survey. Gaps to the west also need survey.

@archie - please give people more than 11 minutes to respond before asking the same question again!

@vakal For the avoidance of any doubt, your access was restored immediately you read the message at osm.org/user_blocks/5402 .

@lockdownguy Are you happy that all the trunk road refs that you said that you were going to re-add are correct?
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1cja (from yesterday) shows fewer than https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1cjb (from February).

@lockdownguy please calm down. Repeated accusations of "vandalism!" don't reinforce whatever point you are trying to make.
There is a genuine discussion to be had about what names should be used; NFZANMNIM did the right thing by asking at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71448 (and it would have been helpful to mention that at changeset/112279744 too; I've now added that link).
@lockdownguy if you find yourself annoyed by something it often helps to take a break before replying rather than "venting your spleen" via the keyboard. If you make further accusations of vandalism like this where it isn't justified we (the DWG) will have to consider enforcing a break from OSM via a short block.
Re the road reference numbers in Baghdad, I'll comment somewhere more relevant.
Best Regards,
Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)

Your changeset comment here "Revert Iranian nationalist vandalism in Israel, change the 'name' tag back to hebrew" is somewhat inaccurate, as is borne out by the discussion on changeset/112746759 .

@NFZANMNIM It would also have been helpful to link to https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71448 here. In that post to the "users: Israel" forum (which I believe has mappers from a variety of backgrounds within the modern state of Israel) you asked how names should be used here.

Also includes near Nun Monkton, from survey 25/09/2021, tr9183a

("Macmillan Way", obviously)

OK, so all of the railway up to the viaduct should be in the route relation then. Is the walking route over the viaduct where the old railway was? If so, there probably shouldn't be separate ways for the footpath and former railway.
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks - When I find one of those I normally stick a note explaining what the problem is, like node/9183668826 .
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
In this changeset you've introduced a break in the Wye Valley Walk Relation (61495).
Although tree cover doesn't show the path, GPS traces do: way/892359052#map=19/51.75488/-2.67327&layers=G .
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1cdO shows how things were before this change. Do you know if the route north from the road to the footpath is actually blocked?
Best Regards,
Andy