A bit more info - there's a discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-edits-by-digitalegypt-not-aligned-with-reality/124533 . It'd be great if you could comment there.

For info, there's a discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-edits-by-digitalegypt-not-aligned-with-reality/124533 . It'd be great if you could comment there.

Looking at the wider area on imagery there's definitely more tunnel=culvert that I'd have expected - I guess it's below ground level, but there's nothing over the top of it (apart from the bridges). way/742792269/history looks like an aqueduct with nothing over the top of it and the stream underneath?

Hello,
Is way/1302914758/history really both underground _and_ a bridge?
That seems an odd combination.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello again AvidFan,
Just a reminder - lots of other mappers (including me!) have commented on your changes, and have let you know the problems that you have caused. You can see these comments at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10965811 . Before doing any other OpenStreetMap updates, please read them and answer all of the questions that people have asked.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Just to let you know, after this edit there was a bit of a gap in the relation for the Sperrins AONB. I created way/1352303735 and added it to the relation to fill it in.
Let me know if you've got any questions.
Cheers,
Andy

آیا یکی از شما می تواند به عکسی از تابلوی خیابان واقعی پیوند دهد؟

Can either one of you link to a photograph of the actual street sign?

See changeset/161360974 for info

See comment on changeset/161360974 for info

Hello Bob, and welcome back to OSM.
Can you explain a bit more what you mean about "delete unwanted lines" here?
The deletion of e.g. way/42250174 seems to be of something that, according to the available imagery, still exists. Is it really not like that any more?
Best Regards,
Andy

(see https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=161360974 for the full story of this changeset)

No reply, so I've fixed this in changeset/161344574 .

Just checking - are you sure that node/8852902468/history is a osm.wiki/Tag%3Ahighway%3Demergency_access_point as described on that page?

OK - done!

Thanks - I'll let you fix it since you know what should be what. There's no great urgency...

Hello,
I just wondered whether places like the bridge at relation/8595349#map=19/50.991481/-2.808351 were supposed to be still part of that cycle relation? Also see http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=8595349 .
Best Regards,
Andy

It's not sarcasm. Both signs are clearly unofficial. One an a4 piece of paper temporarily attached to a wall for the photo, the other a graffito sprayed on it. If anything, "stalin" is likely to be the more permanent of the two

> Do you think there are issues with edits in this changeset?

Hopefully not, but I've genuinely no idea. If there are any issues I'm sure they'll become clear when the community has had chance to review the import plan and the data already uploaded, licence details, etc.

Re the osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Yerevan_Tree_Map#Import_plan page, you created that AFTER this import:

osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Organised_Editing/Activities/Yerevan_Tree_Map&action=history

> Do we still need a complex import plan described for this, with revert plan etc?

Yes, if you want the data you have already imported to stay in OSM rather than be reverted.

You were told what you need to do via the comments to @YerevanTreeMap/diary/405949 . To ignore those comments shows disrespect to the rest of the OSM community.