No problem. I've filled in the gaps, and the two townlands seem valid as polygons again.
One thought though - the eastern bit of way/1350089485 looks a bit like a dirt farm track (I presume a private one). Would it be correct to add those tags?
The western bit just looks like a connection across the field on the Bing and ESRI imagery - I'm guessing in the Midlands in January it might be a bit muddy right now :)

Hello,

> Might not be a 100% accurate.

Please don't do this. Mapping recent events based on news reporting is hugely problematic. OSM often sees this in war zones, where something has happened but the initial reports about what may not be 100% correct. I suspect that the situation here is similar.
Any OSMers most familiar with the area won't be able to comment right now on what you have done because they will be too busy keeping themselves and their families safe.
Best Regards,
Andy

See my comments at changeset/160174336 . No reply there, so I re-added it here.

I've re-added the deleted cycle path in changeset/161201098 . If that's wrong, please do let me know.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It looks like this edit might have introduced a gap in the "Sandstone Trail" relation relation/50726#map=18/53.074166/-2.745740 . Previously that didn't have a gap: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1WV5 .
Do you think you would be able to add the necessary ways back into the relation or would you like someone to help with this?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Just so you know, I think that something in this changeset might have deleted something that was the boundary of a couple of townlands - relation/4161139 and relation/4161138 . The previous situation of one of them can be seen at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1WUV .
Would you like to fix this or would you like some help with that?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
After this edit there is a bit of a gap in the Saxon Shore Way relation/8864#map=19/51.394665/0.563562 .
Does it follow the diagonal path or the footpath that cuts the corner?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello again mapeing,
I suspect that the information that you have added here doesn't actually reflect reality. For example, if you wanted to cross the road here, I'm sure that you would not need to follow this route: osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=51.394888%2C0.499913%3B51.394831%2C0.500114#map=19/51.394646/0.499720
There's been plenty of discussion about whether mapping sidewalks separately adds any value (I suspect it does in some cases, but not in others - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/undiscussed-mass-deletion-of-separate-sidewalks/117491/7 ).
What was the reason that you added them here, and are you really prevented from just walking across Kingswear Gardens?
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks - "Whitechurch Parish" et al have popped back into the database this morning.

Thanks!

Grr - forgot to close changeset - and the second part of this (unconnected) is "filled in gap in NCN61_R 31640".
There's nothing between Knaresborough and Welwyn in here.

Hello,
I think this edit might have caused some problems with relations.
If you have a look at relation/11060057 you can see that it now has a gap in it, but a few days ago it didn't https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1WNb .
Other affected relations might include
11044388 | Diocese of Cork
10909313 | Diocese of Cloyne
5688364 | Carhoo
6514527 | Whitechurch
Are you OK to add these back, or would you like any help?
Best Regards,
Andy

See changeset/161112751

Edits to other tags are obviously a bit guesswork - it'll probably look like way/1080265350 but with food available (I'm guessing that the lino is for the bin, the OGM name will go and the outdoor seating will stay).

Hello klaratabaku914 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
One question - what were the issues that you fixed here? A changeset comment of "Fixed issues" doesn't really help explain...
Best Regards,
Andy

I've mentioned this again at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/its-time-to-address-the-a8-m/117468/11 ; I'd suggest that that is probably the best place to discuss.
Best Regards,
Andy

I've mentioned this again at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/its-time-to-address-the-a8-m/117468/11 ; I'd suggest that that is probably the best place to discuss.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Are way/1122844274/history#map=17/52.566282/-1.431790 and way/1122862056/history#map=18/52.566262/-1.431788 the same thing? They're both gas pipelines in the same area.
Best Regards,
Andy

Cześć train_01,
Andy z OSM’s Data Working Group tutaj.

Każda z Twoich edycji ma komentarz do zestawu zmian „.”. To nie pomaga innym maperom zrozumieć, co właściwie robisz. Ponadto wielu użytkowników próbowało się z Tobą skontaktować za pośrednictwem Twoich zestawów zmian. Zostały one do Ciebie wysłane e-mailem i możesz je zobaczyć na stronie https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2298842 . Odpowiedz, klikając na zestaw zmian i komentując go osobiście.

Pozdrawiam,
Andy

Hello train_01,
Andy from OSM’s Data Working Group here.

Each of your edits has a changeset comment of “.”. This doesn’t help other mappers understand what you’re actually doing. Also, lots of users have tried to get in touch with you via your changesets. These will have been emailed to you, and you can see them at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2298842 . Please do reply, by clicking through to the changeset and commenting there yourself.

Best Regards,
Andy