See comments on changeset/160914790

你好 meongseolin，
你曾两次尝试更改此处的管理边界级别，但两次都被改回。如果您认为有什么问题，请在论坛 c.osm.org 上讨论。
此致，
Andy Townsend，代表 OSM 数据工作组

Hello meongseolin,
You've twice tried to change the admin boundary levels here and it has twice been changed back. If you thing that something is wrong, please discuss on the forum c.osm.org .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

You cannot use Google Street View to update OSM because the licence is not compatible

Are you sure that there is a ridge crossing Scampton's main runway? I think it might cause something of an obstacle to people taking off...

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You've used "wetland=island" here - I'm not sure what that means?
You can see what values tend to be used with "wetland" in the UK at https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe:united-kingdom/keys/wetland#values and internationally at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/wetland#values .
You also might want to think about drawing it as an area rather than a point, so that anything processing the data has a bit more of an idea how big it is.
Best Regards,
Andy
PS: Any questions - please don't hesitate to ask!

Hello,
Thanks for updating this here. It looks like NCN12 also routes over that new bit of cycleway, so I've added that too.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello DaanLT,
I'm sure you could do a _bit_ better than "additions, corrections" every single time :)
Best Regards,
Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)

Hello,
You've deleted way/1317612878/history here, but if it's "unsafe and closed to public use" it'd be better to keep the geometry in OSM and change the tag from "highway" to something like "disused:highway" (see osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_decay ). If you just delete it, there is a risk that someone will just re-add it ("I know there is a bridge here - I was there a couple of years ago"). If you leave it there but make it clear that it is not currently a highway=footway, it is less likely to be re-edited.
Best Regards,
Andy

If there's a difference of opinion here, perhaps mention it at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/us/78 and see what other people have to say?
Best Regards,
Andy (from the DWG)

See https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/6062#issuecomment-2564842136 and https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/is-this-the-same-person/123461 .

No worries - I can do it. I've just changed the Hop Leaf in Reading (which was definitely bar billiards).

Yes - it was very closed a year ago, but sounds like it's open again now.

osm.org/user_blocks/17010

@mateusz - will SC display a 0-hour block to the user?

Thanks!

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It was me that forgot to clarify that that foot and bicycle access was permitted, back in 2022 - see https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/32493721 . I've undone the duplicate cycle path here, since there isn't one, but clarified the access in changeset/160542044 .
Hopefully that's all OK now?
Best Regards,
Andy
PS: Any other questions, please don't hesitate to ask...

Thanks for trying to fix this - unfortunately it still left a duplicate cycleway in place that does not exist. I've reverted both this and the changeset that caused the initial issue, changeset/159271399 .
Chan you check that all now looks OK at your end?

A quick web search suggests that wholesale wicker baskets seems to be their thing, so fill your boots based on that.

Great, thanks!

Hello,
The access tag on node/355992929/history
that was added here was "privateclientelism". Someone's changed that to "customers;private" (which isn't particularly meaningful). What was the access tag supposed to be here - I'm guessing that "privateclientelism" was just a typo?
Best Regards,
Andy