Hello Rupert,
6 days ago you were sent this message: osm.org/user_blocks/16645 . You appear to be ignoring it. In this changeset (with comment "#hotosm-project-17514 #cydnerthedd #resilience #GreenWales added buildings") you appear to be carrying on the same activity. Can you please explain what you're actually trying to do? One thing that I can see is, despite the "added buildings" comment, you have not added any buildings here.
I'd suggest creating a new topic at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/uk/86 to explain.
Best Regards,
Andy

Edited at changeset/156354917 .

What was the source of the wikidata item? It just looks like bot-created garbage: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q24661403&action=history .
The locality in OSM is also rubbish; it looks like the source is OS OpenData and it's actually the name of the adjacent farm, not a separate locality.
The alleged castle site (which "people on the Internet" claim probably isn't one) is apparently what OSM has as "Flat Cop" to the north.

Hello Jason Suggs, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
From the imagery, it looks like way/9009584 continues to the east of Mimsville. I appreciate that you've said "... They will be re-drawn ..." but (a) you've not done that and (b) that isn't normally the way that updates are added to OpenStreetMap - typically people would update what's already there rather than just deleting it.
If you've got any questions, I suggest that you ask in the US forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/us/78 .
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello 364,
Can you explain why you deleted them?
Best Regards,
Andy

Maybe try https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#16/51.6992/-0.0119/H which might do a better job of showing former buildings etc.?

Please don't add things that no longer exist to OpenStreetMap!
OSM is a map of how things are now, not things that have been demolished.

For info, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/problematic-access-changes-by-microsoft-mappers-in-the-uk/117945/6 .

مرحبًا،
ماذا يعني "988" هنا؟
مع أطيب التحيات،
آندي

Hello,
What does "988" mean here?
Best Regards,
Andy

@CAI Salò

> No further communications will follow. Thank you. CAI Salò.

OpenStreetMap is a shared project, and we have to work together to create the best map. You (as a member of an organisation) don't get a veto on that - other members of that organisation may disagree.
Please do join the conversation at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/alpinist-routes-marked-as-footpaths/117644 explaining your thoughts here - we'd love to get your side of the story.
Best Regards,
Andy

Are you sure about "sac_scale=alpine_hiking" for Giddy Edge? It is halfway up a cliff, but it's not _that_ difficult, surely?
Best Regards,
Andy

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/alpinist-routes-marked-as-footpaths/117644/73

Hello,
Was this mechanical edit discussed anywhere?
Best Regards,
Andy

See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/prosba-do-zarzadu-osm/117380/10 "Can’t be secondary because of road signs D-40 “living street” and D-41 “end of living street”:"

Sowerby Bridge to Brighouse, from survey 2/8/2024, ts1131a

Great - thanks.

Hello,
It looks like this has made way/103563702/history all one long bridge.
I'm guessing that this is not correct?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
It looks like this edit has made way/98531456/history all one very long bridge.
I'm guessing that that is not correct?
Best Regards,
Andy

So should they still be there as "rcn"s, or are those already mapped as something else?