To be clear - data taken from Bing Maps is NOT suitable for copying into OSM for licence reasons, although Bing aerial imagery can be used. See osm.wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for what is acceptable.

grep ERR complex_revert.log | grep -v "410 Gone" | grep "^way" | sort -u | wc
52 832 5138

All update fails and a sample of the delete fails look OK.

2 zombie buildings. Both look OK

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/179a
Nothing motorway-secondary.

I've also checked all non-deletes in this changeset and and edited the worst "zombies".

20 ways failed revert, all have been at least to some extent an improvement.

blackboxlogic, thanks for the explanation.

Utsab Khatiwada,
I sympathise with your problem, and have already suggested that the person who's directing your edits here engages directly with the OSM US community.

For info, I asked a question about this change at osm.org/user_blocks/5000 .

One more thing - I know it's a pain when you're making changes from a mobile phone, but it'd be great if you can add a bit more detail about why you changed the names back.
I think what you did was correct (it was exactly what I did in changeset/90450146 last year) - it'd just be great to have more information about the change.

Hello aslanosm,
I'm guessing here that you're trying to revert the previous name changes on node/4027452036 here?
From looking at http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=4027452036 (not sure how good that looks on a mobile phone) you can see that although you've changed some of the names back, some of the names are still the ones added changed by the last editor. If you'd like them all changed back, please let us (OSM's Data Working Group) know by emailing data@openstreetmap.org.
Best Regards,
Andy

If you scroll down on a changeset page like this one you can click on "Changeset XML". In there, in this case, you will see 'uid="152074" '.
Any bit of OSM XML that someone has edited will do, so if you look at the XML of the history of an OSM object you'll see the uid for each version.

There are both restorations of deleted ways and deletions of duplicates here.

An example of a restore is way/928687262/history (the previous deletion was an attempt to remove duplication, but removed valid data too).

An example of a delete is
way/928700795/history . The addition was a duplicate of way/172432818/history, the deletion valid and the restore in error.

Hello BaasankhuuB,
Lots of buildings here, including
way/807236478 , are named "ger". This seems unlikely. Can you explain what "ger" means?
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks for raising it at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2021-May/061389.html .

Hello,
Can you please in a bit more detail what "I change some places name, with the correct one" means? What are you changing from and to?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
This is your first changeset, and the first thing you've done is to delete something, breaking existing OSM data. See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/175i for an example. We'll have to restire that.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

I don't understand how blackboxlogic's advice here "is in conflict with that guidance and the One feature, one OSM element guidance"?

@pabi12 As a reminder, please note that you will need to go back through all your previous edits and ensure that everything that may have been deleted is restored (as previously noted at changeset/101975882 ).

When you say "simply taking information from Bing only and making edits on OSM" can you explain your process? Are you searching in Bing Maps and copying data from there?

@Riyana_Shrestha Please use more helpful changeset comments in preference to just "added information"

@Riyana_Shrestha What was your original data source?

Also, the merging of https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/170R with the way t the west broke relation/12552720 (without actually changing it, just by editing one of the ways in it). I've fixed that too, also in changeset/104195734 . Both should pop back into existence as multipolygons now.