Follow-on from comment at changeset/104259454 , referring specifically to the edit of node/4027452036 in changeset/103657936 .

Hello “Constant & variant”,

You’ve used a changeset comment here of “I change some places name, with the correct one”. Unfortunately, you haven’t explained why your names here are “correct” and the other names here are “wrong”. This is particularly important when the names used for somewhere have political significance - here there are two claims for “what country this place is part of and who it should belong to”.

I asked you about similar changes in changeset/104259454 and you didn’t reply - maybe you didn’t see the email message, so I’m sending this message as one that you have to read before continuing to edit. You’ll be able to continue as soon as you’ve read it. We don’t want to stop you from contributing to OSM - it’s especially important in conflict and former conflict areas such as this region - we just want to make sure that you’ve seen the message. If you’ve got any questions please email data@openstreetmap.org .

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM’s Data Working Group.