Thanks!

Thanks!

Hello,
I wonder if you might be able to fill in some of the gaps that there are in https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=6490318 ?
(you can use https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=6490318 to "re-analyse" after fixing some to see what is left)
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks!

Hello,

It looks like this edit might have created a gap in the outer way of 8815682, the High Weald National Landscape relation. I've joined it up in changeset/165504890#map=20/51.1964417/0.1558513 .

You can check relations by using the "validate" button in JOSM.

Best Regards,
Andy

Hello, a quick question about the Rob Roy Way:
There's a bit of a gap currently at relation/189465#map=18/56.527225/-4.111209 . Do you know if that's deliberate (maybe the bridge can't be used for some reason) or accidental and just needs joining up?
Best Regards,
Andy

Best of luck, and I'm sure I'll call in once you've opened.
Today I'll have to carry on to the Cross Hills tap...

Is this definitely open?
Other sources suggest it may have closed late last year.
Hopefully it has reopened :)

Thanks - makes sense. I've changed it to "farm_auxiliary".

EV1 should be OK here now: http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=9540148 .
Also EV2 http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=5479822 .

Thanks for updating this to say that the change was based on local knowledge.

Thanks for confirming local knowledge here in the update to way/507631409/history .
(to anyone else spotting this - it's clearly visible on OSM-compatible imagery too).
Local knowledge I presume also applies to way/498577935/history (which is in the same area, and from which another mapper has removed the Google tag)

Reverted in changeset/165369722 and redacted

Thanks!

There are a few options - one is to keep them as a multipolygon but to remove the "building" tag from relation/13505281/history and add "building=yes" to way/152963307 and "building=roof" to way/222122213 . Another option is to draw the larger perimeter of the fuel station area and move the tags to that (without a building tag) or to a node (again without a building tag)

I'd be really helpful to be a bit more descriptive in changeset comments - "tweak areas" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here as this is actually a revert using JOSM's revert plugin...

Thanks - done in changeset/165235237

Hello,
I'm a bit confused by the change here. Previously way/881142231/history was an area runway and it didn't have a linear component. The MR challenge said to add the linear runway and change the area to area:aeroway=runway, but you didn't do that - you removed the area tag, which meant that it's possible to misinterpret the runway as a linear circle.
Am I missing something here, or does the data need fixing here?
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks - obvious really!

Hello,
I think that something gone a bit wrong here.
After this changeset, way/1287508458/history is aligned with the area of the agricultural building visible on aerial imagery, but the building type is "house (site of)" and the name seems a bit odd for an agricultural building.
If you look at https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=158935998 and zoom in you can see what happened - that name and building type corresponds to something that was here a long time ago ("ty'n y nant" - "the house in the stream"). That was added in changeset/151963821#map=15/52.39429/-3.92576 . I've no idea what the source was since that changeset doesn't say, but whatever it is that name and building type probably belongs on https://www.openhistoricalmap.org rather than here.
I'll update that (and the others).
Any questions about how to spot these, please get in touch!
Best Regards,
Andy