SomeoneElse's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 187036776 | @FajrAl Apakah Anda memerlukan bantuan untuk melakukan pembatalan perubahan di sini? Sebagai catatan tambahan, ini adalah jenis suntingan yang *seharusnya* didiskusikan terlebih dahulu dengan komunitas untuk mencegah kesalahpahaman. |
|
| 187036776 | @FajrAl Do you need help with a revert here? For completeness, this is _exactly_ the sort of edit that should be discussed with the community first to prevent any misunderstanding. |
|
| 187096654 | Also, quoting "amenity=car_repair":
|
|
| 187096654 | You've tagfiddled "amenity=car_repair" to https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=service%3Dcar_repair . That's much rarer than https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=shop%3Dcar_repair . Any reason why? |
|
| 187097338 | Have you checked with any data consumers of the tags you are changing? |
|
| 187038575 | This looks very much like a mechanical edit. Did you go through osm.wiki/Automated_edits and discuss these changes with any consumers of these tags? |
|
| 187253984 | Also ts2784a to Stalybridge. Huddersfield Narrow Canal. |
|
| 187094875 | Following on from the questions in changeset/156807539 , does the driveway way/1505731276/history really have names in three languages? " 2nd Street's 3rd Dead End" sounds more like a description than a name. |
|
| 156807539 | @David Osipov Please answer the questions.
|
|
| 186639819 | Re "There is no way the Three Forests way should be joining the road here as its a fast main road with no safe crossing point"; that sounds like something that someone would need to take up with Essex Ramblers according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Forests_Way .
|
|
| 186917397 | (for info I'm just looking at http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=11017 ) |
|
| 186917397 | I'm guessing that the bridge at relation/11017#map=22/54.9897956/-3.4762995&layers=V might want removing from NCN7 as well? |
|
| 186798420 | Hello,
|
|
| 185347266 | It's clearly not water either. See changeset/185316811 . |
|
| 186639819 | Hello,
|
|
| 186858339 | Source was linked note, not survey. |
|
| 171922553 | I'm not sure what happened here but I've _really_ removed it just now (and added a few more tags) |
|
| 186170535 | It's not to do with this change at all; I just thought you might know whether that other bit was also part of the relation? |
|
| 186290447 | Note that some of the things changed may both have a valid `name:ca` and a valid `name:es`. Depending on what is in-use locally, it may be appropriate for some `name` tags to contain both languages (in either order). This revert is a status-quo-ante revert of some bad-faith edits - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/151 for detail. An example of where both names appear to be in use is way/243330496/history (see unfortunately not-directly-usable photo at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/151 ) See also osm.org/user_blocks/21009 and numerous previous blocked sock-puppets by this user in Spain. |
|
| 185937912 | Re " You can see this on ... or Google Maps Street View, for example." For the avoidance of doubt, you cannot use Google Maps Street View to update OSM. The licence is incompatible. |