DaveF's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 72560552 | about 6 years ago |
This is another example of you thinking the tail can wag the dog.
|
| 75501437 | about 6 years ago | I'm fully aware you didn't add the tag.
Do you have contact details for your suplliers? |
| 75629906 | about 6 years ago | Hi
The accurate tag is:
Note it doesn't require a layer tag as it;s at grounf level, but the building should have one with a positive integer.
|
| 75501437 | about 6 years ago | I think they're misunderstanding. Do you have an email contact for them? |
| 54352628 | about 6 years ago | Thanks
|
| 54352628 | about 6 years ago | Dog parks are usually specific sectioned of areas for canines to have a shit. Is this in fact just a normal recreation ground where some people occasionally take their charges for a walk? |
| 54533702 | about 6 years ago | Humour me: What's a "virtual" path? |
| 75501437 | about 6 years ago | I believe there are two separate issues here: 1. I don't think your software should throw an error for 'destination' as the station is, after all, the bus's destination. 2. I don't think destination is appropriate on these ways as there's no signs (AFAIK) indicating restricted access to the station & car parks. There should be (& is) a destination tag for the stretch of road behind the multi-storey where there is a 'no through road' sign |
| 75501437 | about 6 years ago | What tag was preventing PSVs from using these roads? |
| 75421702 | about 6 years ago | Hi Welcome to OSM.
Cheers
|
| 75239073 | about 6 years ago | Hi Steve
'Surface' is also a v. useful addition Cheers
|
| 55966688 | about 6 years ago | No it's not .
|
| 55966688 | about 6 years ago | What folly? There's nothing there. See the photo |
| 55966688 | about 6 years ago | Hi
|
| 74829254 | about 6 years ago | in which case the construction=residential tag can be removed. As can the streets, presumably? |
| 74826059 | about 6 years ago | |
| 74826059 | about 6 years ago | There's a chamfer & some steps were alongside:
|
| 74484473 | over 6 years ago | I would go with 'ground truth' where what can be seen on the ground takes priority and revert these edits:
|
| 74484473 | over 6 years ago | What do the signs say? |
| 73838677 | over 6 years ago | Thanks for that. Now corrected. More likely PICNIC error. |