OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
69408231 about 6 years ago

Hi
way/291615512
Do you remember if the sign designated it as a *public* footpath?

76020844 about 6 years ago

Hi
FP 170 is not the path's name. Please use prow_ref if it's the local authority's official reference.

36716510 about 6 years ago

Hi
Do you know if this footpath is still closed?
way/67244091

31596215 about 6 years ago

Ah ,FFS! I can't win with some on OSM. Check with them to make sure any changes are accurate & I get this kind of reply. Don't inform them & they cry like big girls blouses.

Unlike some I could mention I take time to ensure my contributions are as accurate as possible

31596215 about 6 years ago

Hi
The Great Eastern Main Line is still a part of National Rail network I believe .

31596215 about 6 years ago

Hi
Do you remember why you amended 'network' from National Rail to TFL Rail?

73568386 about 6 years ago

Hi
Why have you split trains station into two separate objects with duplicating tags?

74328868 about 6 years ago

Welcome to OSM
FYI
I reverted your duplicate Lea Green station as there should only be one per station.

70874715 about 6 years ago

Ah apologies. I sent to wrong contributor. I've reverted a 'station' to your 'stop'

70874715 about 6 years ago

FYI
I deleted your duplicate Lea Green station as there should only be one per station.

75801775 about 6 years ago

Dawesy went to private email

75801775 about 6 years ago

Why have you marked this path as non accessible?

65587177 about 6 years ago

Well, that's annoying to see. FB haven't updated their render in over a year! Puts OSM in a poor light.
I've asked on one of their forums if there's anything that can be done. Short term - probably not. but will keep you posted.

75683541 about 6 years ago

I didn't check the substation. Is that the building to the left in my photo? Looks to abut straight onto the road.

Just because something isn't mapped at one location doesn't mean the same object can't be added elsewhere. If you wish to add these parking service roads (& car parks), go for it. It adds good detail to the map.

75691207 about 6 years ago

Any idea where this is?:
note/1941123#map=18/51.44356/-2.56655&layers=N

75683541 about 6 years ago

When i first started in OSM I was informed: "if it's physical & stationary, you can map it"

These service roads are for multiple parking spaces for multiple houses so not even private drives.

service=driveway

75683541 about 6 years ago

I know where the photographs were shot- I took them.

Driveways are mapped as service roads.

Please revert /your/ erroneous edit.

54533702 about 6 years ago

From OSM's welcome page: "OpenStreetMap is a place for mapping things that are both real and current "

Virtual is an antonym of real.

Virtual means it doesn't exist.

highway=virtual is ambiguous in class. It could be a motorway!

This is one of the most ridiculous OSM tags I've come across.

Pedestrianized areas, by their definition, means people can walk in all directions.
If there is a designated route (PROW for example) then map it as highway=footway with the assortment of required subtags.

75683541 about 6 years ago

Please reinstate those roads as the do exist.
To the left:
https://snipboard.io/Rp8Nbz.jpg
To the right:
https://snipboard.io/APCfEk.jpg

Are you sure the cul-de-sacs have the same name as the existing road?

72560552 about 6 years ago

What a pathetic response. And not a very nice way to talk about employees of travelline.

The wiki is a collaboration of many hundreds of OSM's contributors. The OSM database is similar but in thousands.
The consensus is clear: bus/psv=designated is a fully accepted tag. Editors have it listed as a default.

It's very disappointing a company believes they're entitled to ride rough-shod over agreed practices.