Thos were just a couple of examples. You've placed many ways on the roads that need to be offset.

Please be aware farmland is meant to be used to map individual fields, not swathes of land

Rather than split every entity up into small sections & spend a lot of time creating relations, why not just trace around those entities & roads? It would be much quicker.
You've ended up this kind of nonsense: osm.org/#map=19/51.41423/-2.39307

Hi mdt3k
I believe making OSM more entropic by unnecessarily splitting way makes it more confusing & harder for others to edit.
Instead of splitting & creating an unnecessary relation for this residential area: relation/5494095 the farmland way should be drawn as a parallel way adjacent, or even on top of the residential.

way/369745839
Road way represent the infinitesimally thin centre line of the road. Adding field boundaries to them cause mayhem for routing software. If other entities are added, such as barrier=gate/fence it says that they're in the middle of the road. Clearly not the case. Please offset the farmland to the side of the road Example: osm.org/#map=19/51.38766/-2.40862

FYI I've started a conversion on the tagging list to fid out how others are using landuse=farmland:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2015-September/026477.html

Hi mdt3k
Could you explain in more detail what you've done generally, & specifically the Kelston & Swinford relations?

If changesets are problematic the creators needs to correct their own errors & revert them.

Do you know what it is now? Still derelict?

Hi
I deleted the relations you created. They're not really required in this instance - ways can be overlaid, & it's difficult to to see things such as the playground if hidden in a relation.

Err... try https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues

Hi again
Ways don't have to be split at nodes with tags, such as stiles, It better if a way is as joined up a it can be. I've connected the relevant ones.
Cheers
Dave F.

Sorry for the delayed reply.
OSM is a database. Lot's of different rendering are mad from this one source. It allows map creators to add relevent data & ignore what the don't want.

What's now described as the 'standard' map ie the mapnik rendering unfortunately doesn't render all barriers. It would be good if it did. You can lobby your case for it here: Grumpy Cat

Dave F.

Welcome to OSM.

Actually you added an extra barrier, but I sorted it out by removing the tags on the nodes. I also amended all the other barriers so they don't join the roads.

Hi Snake Skin

There's an expression in OSM: 'Don't tag incorrectly to suit the renderer'.

For accuracyIf a KG is a KG then it should be tagged as such. If you wish an item to be visible in a specific render you should contact the person creating the tiles.

Cheers
Dave F.

http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/sites/default/files/widcombe_parade_revised_scheme_plan.pdf

Ha! You beat me to it.

There's a slight updated plan Jan '15 amended road markings, loading bays etc.
Are you going to add the contraflow bike lane?
According to plan the call box is still there

Hi again
Could you ensure paths (& all ways) join up to each other otherwise routing won't work.

Please revert this erroneous edit.

Hi
The area for the pub was valid - it encompasses the building & any exterior land belonging to the business. Amended pub name tag to suit.

Hi
I notice you've removed barn/agricultural tags from buildings. Could you explain your reasoning? If the style of tag is incorrect then it should be amended, but I don't think relevant data should be deleted.

Ruth. These ways do not join. Please revert this changeset. Do not assume just because your software is telling you there's a problem that there actually is. A clue to your edit being incorrect is you extended the road to bridge.

Hi
Unsure how you can describe a road between 2 other roads of the same classification as a 'link'. Especially when they have the same reference. Please clarify.

Hi Welshie
Out of curiosity, which map did you get the road new road layout from? The OS Streetview appears to be at least a year out of date.

Cheers
Dave F.

Bromley Heath Rd, Bristol: osm.org/go/eukPZ~wY--. Are you sure that's the A4174? I think it got renumbered: http://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=A4017
http://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=A4174

What OS OpenData did you use for these amendments & is it up to date?