@skquinn

Your basing your argument on one piece of antiquated software. There were no edits in Houston so your last sentence is contradictory as it's self evident "that it can't be done using the history button."

I didn't create this entity (check history). What do the signs/website say?

@skquinn
This is a failure to not update the way osm.org displays changeset data. It isn't a valid reason to not correct spelling errors. Please use the other, more detailed validation software listed*
This is an Overpass Turbo query which lists all edits around Houston, excluding yours: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JlI

Please remember the goal is to improve the map quality. All else is secondary.

* There's also http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/ but it appears to be down ATM. Hopefully it'll be resurrected.

There are more validating sites than this one. Please use them.

Adjudication of edits should be performed on quality not quantity.

How has this changseset been detrimental to the OSM database?

way/691952101

I don't think this is a looped road. It#s two separate roads leading to individual houses.

@ LivingWithDragons
This clearly wasn't an automated edit.
ForstEK's intentions & reasons were clearly defined.
This edit clearly improved the quality of the database.
Please stop with the finger-wagging sanctimony.

hello

a) It's not a "continuous" track
b} At stations, lines split into multiple tracks to allow passengers of multiple trains to alight/embark. They're 'usage' is still 'main'.
c) 'main lines' can have numerous tracks. They are not restricted to two.
d) Just because a line may not be 'main', It doesn't automatically make it a siding.

I believe you've misinterpreted the wiki page.

It can't be the correct name as the tube line doesn't run past it!.
Even if it were correct there'd be no requirement to collect them into a relation as the name would provide a link.

Station stops can have two platforms, one either side. I think there's a error in the validator. No validator should have it findings taken as gospel.

I fail to see how combining them in a MP helps - They're still two platforms. MP's are meant to be used when mapping can't done with nodes & ways, not just as a reason to collect things together in a nice, neat group.

Thanks. Fixed

Hi
What's the purpose of this relation?
relation/9582149

Wiki says the tube line doesn't use platform 5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratford_station#Station_layout

Hi
Do you remember why you amended this to a siding. AFAIK, it's in use by London Overground
changeset/64841360

Hi
Is this rail line/platform in use?
way/160468859

Shouldn't it be next to platform 2 as 3&4 are closed?

Hi Welcome to OSM
This building doen't require a doctors tag:way/481359435/history

as the surrounding area contains it:
way/39027405#map=19/51.40602/-2.31749

Hi
When using smart phone apps please be aware that many shops are already mapped as polygon buildings. A weakness of these aps is they only display nodes. The pub was already mapped.

Hi
In future please reply on the forum on which you contacted. It makes it much easier to keep track.
In a private message, Rondon237 said "Hi Dave Thanks for your msg. This is a style used elsewhere but I can see both methods used and don’t feel strongly either way. Feel free to amend as you wish. Best wishes Richard"

Along the whole row you've created two identical polygons laid directly on top of each other, but not joined.
way/524571245
way/524713656
It is not a correct, accepted style.
I was hoping you'd be willing to correct your own mistakes.

Lots of duplicated buildings

Hi
Are you sure this is a 'park'
way/647788881

Hi
Should the wiki be updated?
cycle%20network=*?uselang=en#United_Kingdom

Has UK:London Quietways been amalgamated into the new 'Cycleway' or should it be added as a separate classification?

There appears to be some confusion...

You say it's "complete fiction" but then say there's a river waterway. If there is, then there must be a river bank - which you've deleted. Instead, you should amend it using your up to date knowledge & experience to make it more accurate.

As all features appear to represent what's in the latest aerial images, I'm unsure why you believe it has been 'tagged for the renderer'.

To say "the wood covers everything including the river" is evidently wrong as your deletion shows an empty space where the river bank was previously?

In my experience Streetview has been fairly accurate & useful for mapping inaccessible areas, but again, if you've more detailed knowledge - update it, but please don't.delete valid data.

There's only edits in CR & UK. The website draws a rough rectangle around the extremities of the edits.

To check: Are there any additions listed in this changeset you didn't make?