Thanks Mishari for giving more details.

1) 628703875 - Roads in demolished area.
This area was mapped basis Bing, where buildings are available. However Esri doesnt have buildings. As images available in Josm doesnt give the details of imagery date. I was not sure which imagery is latest here. Here we need help from local mappers to guide us and correct us as appropriate . Since you confirmed this area as demolished. I am now going ahead and deleting them.

2)628507844 / 410269871 - Incorrect connectivity
While aligning the segments, nodes seems to be mistakenly extended beyond the intersection . I am correcting now.

3)183877605 / 628709422 - From the navigation perspective of pedestrian mode, connectivity is correct and needed. Please suggest if we are missing anything here.

Thanks,
Sridhar.

Hi Nutchanon Wetchasit,

Thanks for your time and valuable feedback. I have validated all my nearby edits with in the locality and will ensure such edits are not repeated in future.

Thank you,
sridhar1

Hi Mishari,

Thanks for your feedback.

Can you please provide the way id's so that i can investigate further on the edits done.

Thanks,
Sridhar.

Hi Nutchanon,

While digitising roads in this area, i have applied, highway=*, by which land use polygons where not visible.

Hence didn't identify it as school/foundation and assumed it to be residential.

Further while working, I will ensure all layers are switched on and follow the guidelines.

Thanks,
Sridhar.

thanks for valuable feedback and letting me know groundtruth realitty

Hi Nutchanon,

Thanks for your time in sharing feedback

As per satellite Imagery, I couldn't identify it as school campus. Hence considered it as residential building.
Thanks for sharing the real time info.

Thanks,
Sridhar.

Hi Nutchanon Wetchasit,

Apologise for the mistake done. It was a clear miss from my end. I didn't intend to change the boundary of polygon to service road.
There was an internal existing residential road(way/390135072) within the polygon, logically which should be service road. While making this change, i might have mistakenly selected polygon boundary.
I will be extra careful moving forward with my edits.

Thanks,
sridhar.

Hi Nutchanon Wetchasit,

Thanks for the feedback.
As the only resource we have is satellite imagery and through imagery we were not able to identify the connectivity.
Thanks for the appropriate changes and your time for giving feedback.

Thanks,
Sridhar.

Thanks for the effort Nutchanon,

We will ensure existing data is not modified for alignment reasons unless there seems to be a major shift and or is leading to validation errors.
we are using Josm to check history of the segments.

Thanks,
Sridhar.

Hello,

Apologise for not able to understand your feedback.
I tried checking the boundaries of 7 eleven and the nodes of POIs. None of them were modified by me.
Kindly take time to suggest how I go ahead and fix this issue and I will exactly follow your instructions

Sorry again for the trouble

Thanks
Sridhar

Hello Nutchanon,

With respect to connectivity,
Please accept my sincere apologies for the mistake
I did not intend to remove the connectivity, but the node must have been mistakenly moved. However, I should have checked from my side before uploading the change-set
Will be more careful moving forward.

With respect to alignment effort, we checked all the way links mentioned, none of the existing data is aligned to any of the imagery available in Josm. Hence we aligned the existing data with reference to Bing Imagery.
We didn't find any existing imagery offsets used, and strava traces are not available for low priority roads in this area. Hence aligned basis Bing imagery.

For node links mentioned. icons representing map features, we didn't make any changes.

Thanks for your understanding

Sridhar

Hi Nutchanon,

Thanks for your valuable time in sharing the feedback.

Will check the edits and revert with our findings.

Thanks,
Sridhar

Hi hasratulhasfarila,

While working around this area, we found one segment (way/608839159) which doesn't have any tags assigned to it .
So can you look into it and suggest if it is created with any purpose or by mistakenly mapped .

We haven't made any changes from our end.

Thanks,
Sridhar.