Did you intentionally move the shop Gong Cha? If so, you accidently moved a bunch of foot ways which were linked to the node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169327017

These look like random, incorrect changes. Reverting
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152322701

When I need to go fishing for deleted items or back in time for some other reason, I use https://overpass-turbo.eu/.

Looks like it was (accidently?) deleted 2 weeks ago in 148847436.

This changeset deleted the footpath from Bridge Rd to Wentworth Park Light rail station. Fixed in 149562897.

I don't think it is correct to add an extra way here, as the left turners use exactly the same way piece of road that the right turners use which is already there.

According to the OSM wiki, trees don't need to be "significant". If it is causing "unnecessary clutter" it is a problem with the renderer not the data source. Take a look at ESRI's 3D tree layer for a good example of where this data is useful: https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=33383da8a75f4d24b4b6a0d0532abe6e

Hi, Are the trees still there? If so, they probably shouldn't be deleted.

You are right. I have updated it all as it is this afternoon in 146309792.

I updated it to how it was 48 hours ago, but it seems they have opened (and closed) more areas in the last 24 hours so I'll go for a walk this morning to confirm where it all ended up.

The strange "offset" lane seems to only be used occasionally for left turning, but is otherwise a dead lane.

Went for a jog this morning and can confirm that the lanes have been updated as per:
https://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/projects/current-projects/victoria-road-vision/victoria-road-bus-lane-through-rozelle

I just did the lane info for Rozelle Interchange, and this section is the _only_ link of the entire project that is a single lane, so it is certainly wrong for it to be a motorway. I'll revert this change.

I don't really agree with this change. These are links between the M8 and Iron Cove Link. It might not be obvious now, but will be when the rest of the M8 (Western Harbour Tunnel) is built. It is also pretty clear when you drive it, where there is a single lane merges on/off the Iron Cove Link Tunnel. If anything I would think it should be Iron Cove Link which is upgraded from motorway_link to motorway.

I was just fixing up some broken layers, and noticed the two buildings under Western Distributor had layer=1. I was about to remove the tag as I can't see any reason for it. Do you remember why you added it in this changeset? I don't see any reason why the implicit layer=0 is a problem.

I spent so much time going through all the info on the tunnel depth, etc to make sure it was all correct from a level perspective with no crossing paths. Didn't realise I needed smooth transitions!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144457974

I guess the intention of your change was to get the crossing tags in there. I checked and it is fine to do this with the combination of highway=cycleway, cycleway=crossing, crossing=traffic_signals, foot=yes, which aligns with the standard shared path mapping tags.

I noticed that in this change and a few others, you have changed some ways from cycleway -> footway. I checked, and these are still cycleways with dedicated bike lamps at the crossing, and are part of the council/govt bike routes. Your change breaks broken cycle routing which flows on to many apps. I have reverted a few of these changes (only the cycleway part) in my area, but it might be worth checking others you have done.

FYI, I fixed this up a bit in 140614181 as it was flagged due to missing relationship roles. Also updated the lane markings which were changed yesterday.

This edit looks good, but I don't think the cycleway you added (way/1196400954) is correct. It is fenced off, and there is a big sign warning that you can't enter without permission. I would have thought it should just be a footway with access=permit, just like all the other roads in the port area?