Comentariile pyrog

Set de modificări	Când	Comentariu
173942775	aproximativ 21 de ore în urmă	Je pense que vos modifications sont faites à titre professionnel (en tant que gestionnaire de la RBI ?). Le plus simple est de continuer cette discussion sur le forum où nous pourrons vous donner quelques liens sur les "bonnes" pratiques.
173944365	aproximativ 22 de ore în urmă	access=no est suffisant. Par contre cela doit correspondre à une interdiction légale. Existe-t-il un arrêté (municipal ou autre) ? Est-ce un chemin privé ? Bref quel est la nature exacte du problème ? Toutes vos modifications sont inadaptées et sont considérées comme du VANDALISME.
173942775	aproximativ 22 de ore în urmă	Bonsoir JP, Merci de nous expliquer le problème. Nous vous expliquerons comment apporter des modifications acceptables dans OpenStreetMap. Cordialement, Yves — Groupe OSM Plein Air https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/vandalisme-sur-le-puech-de-fontaneilles/40259/5
173944690	aproximativ 22 de ore în urmă	https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/vandalisme-sur-le-puech-de-fontaneilles/40259
76403619	cu 6 zile în urmă	Done. The route is visible in WMT : https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=2167203&type=relation&map=11.0/37.9623/-79.7638 But the relation is broken according to WMT's analyser. And it look like a network, or a route with several loops. Do you have any recent sources ? Seem described in trailforks : https://www.trailforks.com/route/middle-mountain-momma-xc/?activitytype=1&z=11.0&lat=37.90353&lon=-79.80252&content=trails,labels,poi,directory,polygon,waypoint,nst,routes_featured
76403619	cu 6 zile în urmă	Hi, Mountain Momma Expert Cross Country isn't route=mountain_bike but route=mtb. I fix it. Best regards, Yves
176194810	cu 16 zile în urmă	Mise à jour visible sur WMT : https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=386891&type=relation&map=14.0/48.6288/2.8227
176194810	cu 16 zile în urmă	Bonsoir, La modification du GR 1 suite au contournement de Guignes est documentée. Je n'ai pas l'impression que le balisage a été refait. Cf. changeset/176327197 Cordialement, Yves — Groupe OSM Plein Air
176008658	cu 21 de zile în urmă	Bonsoir, Ce panneau publicitaire semble être un doublon de node/12328834344 Est-ce bien celui-ci ? https://explore.panoramax.fr/?focus=pic&map=19.18/45.1938337/5.725034&pic=14220ee5-c45e-46c4-8d28-e63407c7085a&speed=250&theme=default&xyz=207.42/-1.63/67 Si oui, merci de fusionner les 2 objets et de lier la photo en ajoutant le tag suivant : panoramax=14220ee5-c45e-46c4-8d28-e63407c7085a&xyz=207.42/-1.63/67 Il existe un groupe OSM local très actif à Grenoble. N'hésite pas à contacter ses membres pour avoir un retour précis sur tes modifications, des conseils… Cordialement, Yves - Groupe OSM Plein Air
175953856	cu 21 de zile în urmă	Bonsoir, node/13377941389 Cet objet n'est pas vraiment un poteau directionnel. C'est plutôt un panneau d'information. Le tag name est "descriptif". D'après cette photo ça serait plutôt "Eglise Saint-Laurent". https://explore.panoramax.fr/?focus=pic&map=23/45.193366/5.7199646&pic=ae5a4541-af4d-4aae-9faa-71484f5c369a&speed=250&theme=default&xyz=135.29/9.17/79 Je n'ai pas le temps ce soir de regarder tous tes changesets, mais ici je vois encore un objet avec un nom descriptif : node/13377941387 Cordialement, Yves - Groupe OSM Plein Air
175954930	cu 21 de zile în urmă	Le nom est "descriptif" : ce n'est pas adapté dans OSM. Il faut utiliser des tags dédiés et à défaut le tag note ou fixme. fishing=permit que sur cette zone, sur toutes les berges de l'Isère ? Quel est l'arrêté ? La géométrie de cette zone de pêche est curieuse : en partie sur l'herbe. Ok, le wiki anglophone le décrit.
175310866	aproximativ o lună în urmă	La super route ne change rien. En pratique l’intérêt est uniquement dans l’éditeur de relation de josm qui va afficher un mode chemin de fer qui permet de voir la continuité de l’itinéraire
175310866	aproximativ o lună în urmă	WMT semble les trouver toutes ? https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#search?query=GR%20de%20Pays%20de%20la%20D%C3%A9odatie
170569625	aproximativ o lună în urmă	> I also advocate for using a descriptive value for the `network=` tag to group together related walking and cycling routes rather than using generalized blunt values like `network=lcn`, but that requires a larger discussion. We also facing issue with network relations, network tag with xxn values. I'am personnally fan of using "descriptive value" for network tag. We experiment using network:wikidata tag instead.
170569625	aproximativ o lună în urmă	> For the water trail discontinuities, did you mean the segments weren't ordered properly? Yes, but I didn't specifically check this route, I tried to work only on Golden Spike Trail Network.
170569625	aproximativ o lună în urmă	> For the Golden Spike Trail Network, this isn't really a route so I changed the relation to be type=network. I understand. > I think it's fine to retain relations for stuff like this as long as they're tagged correctly and don't mess up other tools. Unfortunately WMT don't display network relation. I check Golden Spoke Trail Network. It seem that the following routes are partly or completely part of GSTN : - Parley's Trail — Q39054161 : 9 segments - Centennial Trail : 21 segments - Weber River Parkway : 1 segment - Ogden River Parkway : 11 segments - U.S. Bicycle Route 77 — Q108067357: 39 segments - SR-193 Trail : 1 segment - Syracuse Trail : 1 segment - Denver and Rio Grande Western Rail Trail : 9 segments - Legacy Parkway Trail : 6 segments - 9 Line Trail : 1 segment - Jordan River Parkway Trail : 17 segments - Lehi Rail Trail : 4 segments - Murdock Canal Trail : 6 segments - Utah Lake Shoreline Trail : 6 segments Excluded route : - Jordan River Water Trail (canoë) In Europe we design this type of network as : - node network - super route with routes members
170569625	aproximativ o lună în urmă	I reduced the number of segments (125 to 86). And fixed the Jordan River Water Trail discontinuities. I also added a Knooppuntnet monitor for it. Currently it show the number of segments. If you use sub relations for each "alternative", the KPN monitor's map will show each part, and number of segments for each one. https://knooppuntnet.nl/fr/monitor/groups/zzz/routes/Jordan%20River/map?mode=comparison&reference=false&matches=true&deviations=true&osm-relation=true&layers=osm&position=40.61873449,-111.71098347,9
170569625	aproximativ o lună în urmă	Hi Quincy, This relation is discontinued (125 segments according Waymarked Trails). https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=11643604&type=relation I discovered it. It seem a "network" of only 4 trails according the official interactive map. https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/c13dacfd9a4d4d668f34447e3cd139e5/page/Official-Route-(C) In France we have a lot of hiking, mtb or bicycle routes (and long ones). We designed them as 1 superroute and routes (splitted in stages, alternatives, approches…). We have also a lot of node networks. We have issues with big relations and we discuss of using a network:wikidata tag instead of a network relation. Could we discuss about route and network design ? Best regards, Yves — Groupe OSM Plein Air (OSM Outdoor working group)
174664264	aproximativ 2 luni în urmă	Le sentier des buttes est cassé aussi ici : way/1177222846#map=23/48.83931605/2.18858600&layers=V Je corrige. Yves
171580863	aproximativ 2 luni în urmă	Bonjour, Tu as cassé la continuité de l'itinéraire de randonnée "Sentier des Buttes" relation/2866805 Je corrige. Cordialement, Yves — Groupe OSM Plein Air