OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
177652845 18 days ago

Looks great!

177455730 23 days ago

My bad, I thought that building on satellite was the new one...

163173981 about 1 month ago

Hi there,

Sorry for the edits contrary to local convention. Are you comfortable retagging these, or should I take a look and try to fix it?

I'm not currently editing in Cleveland, but I have family from the area, so if I'm ever mapping back in the area, I'll keep this in mind.

Peter

171099808 5 months ago

I adjusted the boundary to match the official park boundary per MontCo's parcels. I looked at the parcel map and it seems that the weirdness along the west side is due to the Pennypack Trail still being in a parcel of a railroad right-of-way, so the park fills some of that in, but isn't officially in that area.

169636799 7 months ago

Thanks for catching that! It's a Linux command to show a list of peripherals to a computer. I'm not sure how it got transferred into here...

166413778 9 months ago

I'm sorry, I must have mistaken this for a different one I took recently. I have taken this trail before, but I think it may have been last summer...

Apologies for my impulsive revert and comment.

166413778 9 months ago

This isn't closed, I walked the length of it 22 days ago, and it's certainly not blocked. That's why I added it.

165617154 10 months ago

I'm not familiar with the source you used, but I'm not sure it's copyright-legal to copy information from it. Same with Parkopedia on another of your changesets.

163964664 11 months ago

That's an error artifact from me keeping track of progress. I will fix that.

163708165 11 months ago

Hello, I removed bicycle=designated because the paths are tagged with highway=cycleway, which as the wiki says, "implies bicycle=designated" (highway=cycleway), so it's basically redundant. I'm not sure why iD thinks that's an error.

The way they're tagged now means it's a shared use path, but it could also be tagged with highway=path, foot=designated, bicycle=designated and mean the same thing.

I'm not local to the area, but the county database of bicycle infrastructure labels these as Shared Use Paths, so unless labeled differently on-site, they seem to be for both foot and bike.

161402791 about 1 year ago

I know I saw some discussion about removing place tags from boundaries, but I can't find it. Do you have a reference so I can familiarize myself? I got confused when my Overpass queries stopped displaying as expected...

160086614 about 1 year ago

Hi, thanks for the edits, but I noticed you removed the 'height' tag when adding 'building:levels'. I recommend leaving 'height' alone, because both tags can coexist. I have readded the 'height' values for this changeset.

158465165 over 1 year ago

I checked the Friends of Wissahickon rules, and they do specifically state that one should stick to designated trails. Therefore, I just went through and tagged all informal trails with `access=no` to really drive the point home. Other maps/sites should respect that more than the `informal=yes` tag.

158465165 over 1 year ago

Do you consider that social trails are a problem, or the adding of them to OSM (or both)? Generally, if they're on the ground, they should be on the map, tagged with `informal=yes` to indicate they're not official trails (see osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F).

147302768 over 1 year ago

Thanks!

155154349 over 1 year ago

Thanks for pointing that out. I changed the bicycle route to a horse route, as that is a listed activity, in changeset/155618569.

153912227 over 1 year ago

Hello, I noticed that you're editing in Philadelphia with Bing Maps as your background. While that is a little more recent, I would suggest you check out the Philadelphia Orthoimagery 2022 (2in) which is higher-resolution and also aligned a little better.

153685913 over 1 year ago

I went back through your edits in this area manually and fixed up any incorrect tagging. I'm local and very familiar with these streets.

I'm curious what prompted the tagging to "traffic_signals", though. I couldn't recreate an iD "issue" about it, so I wasn't sure what led to that.

Thanks!

153685913 over 1 year ago

Hello,
I noticed you changed a lot of crossing nodes to 'crossing=traffic_signals'. This suggests there are crossing lights for the pedestrian crossing, or at least the intersection would be controlled by lights, but in most cases these are stop sign intersections. The appropriate value would be 'uncontrolled'.
Thanks!

126422897 almost 2 years ago

Gotcha! I didn't realize that was a fault with OCM. I'll edit my presets moving forward. At least it's an easy OverpassTurbo query and fix.