relation/1232849

Did you intend to change only a smaller forest area?
In the near future this multipolygon will be destroyed and redrawn due to its inaccuracy. Please double check what you're editing before uploading.

Hey! I want to suggest to read this:
osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Please refrain from naming roads like "unknown track" or "shared-use trail". They have their proper tagging. You can ask people in OSM US Slack community (https://slack.openstreetmap.us/) and you can join #local-pennsylvania + #tagging channels where you can ask the questions on proper tagging. (or if you're more familiar with discord, then https://discord.gg/openstreetmap)

Thanks a lot :) And yeah it's a shame there's no good equestrian maps out there, since a friend of mine is also rides a horse and once I had to navigate her but it seemed like a challenge because of the terrain difficulties.

Szia! Picit túl nagy lett a changeseted. Melyik másik országba sikerült elmozgatnod valami nodeot? :)

(I'm doing a complete overhaul on PA forest landcover, so I came across this)

way/1096866059/history#map=19/40.86431/-78.26507
Hey Shelby! I retagged this basketball court, for each features like this there are actually built in features in iD, and in JOSM, respectively.

+ source: existing OSM data

Wow, you did a lot of details to Hillsboro! Thanks for making this area look awesome

The size of the changeset is because I modified Monongahela National forest's tags (added GNIS feature_id)

Okay, it's still in Greenbrier County. well, this county is huge.

Makes sense in this case. Thanks for the help. Even huge radio masts seem to have the proper tag (mast or tower)

So, for communication tower I understand "cellphone tower" as I interpret, because the communication tower is a broad term. It can be a radio mast, TV mast etc. Okay, as far as I know there is "Mast" and "Antenna" but most radio antennas are masts.

So what I can suggest is to rename the preset which should contain "Big communications tower (>100m tall)" or put presets where the options are already set, like "Cell tower" for it, for example, so we can save time on thinking what should we choose, you get it. This can be the case with TV / Radio antennas too since when I'm mapping landcover I sometimes discover unmapped cell towers and radio stations, so a good tagging preset is always handy :)

Hi skyper,

No, there is only one tower at the location, and I was using the JOSM internal preset (Big communications tower), just I wanted to trace its shape. I can just either delete my change there or retag it and use the utils2 plugin for replacing geometry.

+ changeset/131567356's conversation

Discussion link: https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C3LJ03BCY/p1674504150801339

Alright, as Zeke suggested in #local-vermont in OSM US Slack, I tried to revert the changes, but before uploading, please have a look at it (I pinged you there) and please tell me if there's something wrong with it which should be fixed / still reverted etc.

"We had also communicated which areas each of us was working on. So that is doubly frustrating for me. This could have been avoided. " Yes, actually you're right in this case. Sorry, my bad!

Okay, then we should probably leave the changeset as is because then it would create a lot of conflicts then + unnecessary redrawings of what I did, so it would cause more damage. But if your opinion is different, let's go with that but I won't deal with the amount of "merge" conflicts for sure

My method to map forests are to map over track roads since I don't see any sense of mapping those woodland parts separately. (But this is me)

Yes you can revert the changeset, but then please finish the rest of the county, I'll move back to doing WV then.

I used NAIP too but I didn't write into the sources since NAIP was used for checking.