Also want to note the road already is marked 55mph so OSM data seems to match what you see, so you have old or some other data source.

Hi, another user indicated this changeset seems to be bad and is causing consistency issues. This isn't the right way to change speed limits, you need to change tags and not add another road in parallel. I'll revert this change back to its original form.

No problem, mistakes happen, and the revert feature makes it easy to get things back ... if caught in time. Sorry for not waiting for a response.

I've had some websites reject requests that lack tracking, so even if there is no reason some still do...
I do agree that the tracking params should be removed but if it results in an error then might well remove the whole url. I'd probably try testing both old and new url make sure results are same before updating OSM...

Did you verify that the tracking-cleaned urls still pointed to the appropriate resource versus a 404 or incorrect page?

reverted in changeset/190210059 due to the roundabout appearing to be new and the poor edit (oneway added on 2 way road, leaving junction=roundabout on straightaway) and no objections heard

https://webbcity.net/not-this-year-but-zora-roundabout-will-be-completed-soon/ I think this roundabout is real and should not be deleted. NB this photo is old and without any communication I'm about to revert this changeset.

uh ... wow I'm at a loss for words.
I didn't get the impression the intent was the roundabout removed, where did this come from?
This changeset is also pretty bad and I'd suggest a revert. Need to pull in some other stakeholders opinions...

Oh looks like it's already been fixed by someone, n/m. now just need to figure out what's wrong and it's very possible that there's nothing that can be done if the router uses data we have no control over.

The change you put in does not reflect what's on the ground so it's an incorrect change; I'll go ahead and remove/revert it.

However the routing problem is something separate and needs to be dealt with in a different matter.

welcome to osm!

thanks for trying to fix the problem you see, but the name on the road won't help routing and there is only one road here, not two, and thus is incorrect.
The problem you're describing in
note/5521627 needs to be solved in a different manner and likely it's because the road is marked private, routers tend to ignore closer roads if they are private, however behavior depends on the specific router used.

Bad changeset, needs fix...

I suppose it would be nice that it gets rendered in Carto as something, anything, even just a dot. Seems there's many of these businesses that teach martial arts (that focus on self defense/offense) out there that aren't exactly the same as a fitness center/gym (that focus on strength/stamina)... TBH I don't even look at what iD shows as an icon... will Carto pick up icons from the iD repos?

(and damn typoed Hoggatt too, oh no, now they're going to sue me...)

Framewok?

Sorry just pulling your leg :)

(I or aux5 were thinking of walking by at some point to look, I did not see any signs of their business during a drive-by however, though not everyone gets building face advertisement like Hoggart...)

Roads that are visible in satellite imagery should not be removed as someone will draw them again. This changeset will be reverted.

Please do not destroy valid data on the building, this building had valid address data unrelated to your business. Will revert.

please check that there's not already another duplicate nearby. I saw three cameras that were pointing in the same direction and had similar tags. i kept yours because it had more information but deleted the duplicates. I prefer that you add information to existing cameras instead of deleting/readding but duplicates are bad.

Might be easier to just fix it if they told us exactly what the entry point is...

Hi, sorry about the really long delay in comment and changeset age, but in regards to way/19734958 - an inquiry at note/5391269 seems that this road should be deerwood hill and not hollow. I saw a photograph on mapillary that it's also hill (also that it was a private road)... what was the source of deerwood hollow?

That is a mystery to me too, I've been manually selecting the pieces...Don't blame you this is tough I think.