Drogi Olaf Skwarski,

Otrzymaliśmy skargę od lokalnego polskiego użytkownika dotyczącą twoich zmian, które zawierają podejrzane masowe usuwanie danych. W tym zestawie zmian i kilku innych, różni lokalni użytkownicy komentują twoje zestawy zmian, ale nie odpowiedziałeś na żaden z tych komentarzy.

Uprzejmie proszę o odpowiedź na różne pytania, które zadają ci użytkownicy, w przeciwnym razie będziemy musieli zablokować twoje konto użytkownika. Może to skutkować przywróceniem niektórych zestawów zmian.

Pozdrawiam,

Rafael Avila Coya, w imieniu OSM Foundation, Data Working Group.

Ticket#2025061910000424

Przetłumaczono z DeepL.com (wersja darmowa)

Dear Olaf Skwarski,

We have received a complaint from a local Polish user about your edits, that contain suspicious mass deletion of data. In this changeset and some others, different local users make comments about your changesets, but you have not answered any of this comments.

I kindly ask you to answer the different questions that these users are making to you, or we will have to block your user account. This might be followed by a revert of some of your changesets.

Best regards,

Rafael Avila Coya, on behalf of the OSM Foundation, Data Working Group.

Ticket#2025061910000424

(English, original)

你好，8051，欢迎来到 OSM！

感谢您对地图的贡献。我查看了您最近的编辑，发现这组更改中有 81% 涉及删除，其中包括
- 3 条公路

能否请您确认这些删除是有意为之还是误删？

期待您的回复。

Rafael Avila Coya, on behalf of OSMF DWG

Ticket#2025070210000392

Gracias, José Luis Infante!
Al tratarse de una actividad escolar organizada (esto fue una prueba piloto antes de empezar ya más en serio), preferimos usar FieldPapers para tomar datos sobre el terreno, e iD para editar. De vez en cuando nos encontramos con locales nuevos u otros objetos que no están en OSM, y para eso no son útiles esas aplicaciones. Aunque fáciles de usar, es mejor que aprendan la base del mapeo, y más adelante quizás pueden aprender a usar otras aplicaciones.

Dear user Hwerhwette, please use human-readable messages in your changeset comments. "#hotosm-project-15239 #firewater #malenymaps #DRR " is not sufficient. Please see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for an explanation why this is important.

Estimado/a Paulina_ch:

El comentario de todas tus ediciones es el mismo: "#hotosm-project-18099 #2024_COL_MapatónNacional"

Un comentario así no da información de qué exactamente estás haciendo. Si lo que haces es añadir unas casas o edificios, como es el caso de este conjunto de cambios, podrías añadir esa información y dejar el comentario así: "Añadidas varias casas en zona de El Carmen de Atrato #hotosm-project-18099 #2024_COL_MapatónNacional"

Puedes ver porqué esto es importante aquí: osm.wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Saludos cordiales,

Rafael Ávila Coya, en nombre del Data Working Group, Fundación OpenStreetMap.

Ticket#2024112010000333

Ola, Monchinho:

A parroquia de Reiriz, no concello de Samos, ten 3 lugares: Aián, Reiriz e Veiga.

Veiga aparece como "A Veiga" en diferentes mapas e bases de datos, como o Nomenclátor da Xunta e o IGE, por poñer dous exemplos. Pero é un erro. De sempre e localmente coñécese por Veiga, sen o "A".

Asemade, podes ver que os sinais indicadores de dirección din sempre Veiga, e non "A Veiga". Dous exemplos:

1. Sinal indicador de dirección a Veiga e a Reiriz, na estrada LU-633, á altura de Aián [1].

2. Sinal indicador de dirección a Veiga, á altura da fonte de Reiriz, no lugar de Reiriz [2].

En OpenStreetMap mapeamos o que hai sobre o terreo [3], con prioridade sobre o que apareza noutros mapas ou bases de datos, sexan estas oficiais ou non, e que poden estar erradas, como é o caso.

Pola mesma razón, a ponte de Veiga é 'de Veiga', non "da Veiga".

Xa correxín os nomes deses dous obxectos: changeset/158932223

Por favor: discute aquí calquera dúbida antes de re-editar novamente eses obxectos.

[1] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Indicaci%C3%B3n_Reiriz_e_Veiga.jpg

[2] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Indicaci%C3%B3n_direcci%C3%B3n_Veiga.jpg

[3] osm.wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas#Mapear_lo_que_hay_sobre_el_terreno

Bonjour,

Vous ajoutez beaucoup d'objets OSM erronés pour une grande partie de la Guinée.

Entre autres, vous méconnaissez la classification des différentes voies publiques et la nécessité qu'elles forment un réseau cohérent. Deux exemples, mais je pourrais en citer des centaines :

Dans cette route isolée, par exemple, vous dites qu'il s'agit d'une rue résidentielle alors qu'il s'agit en fait du début du cours supérieur d'une rivière [1].

Cette autre rue ne semble pas exister, et si c'était le cas, il s'agirait d'une route rurale ou d'un chemin, et non d'une rue résidentielle. [2]

Vous ajoutez également de nombreux polygones d'occupation des sols qui se chevauchent, comme ces deux exemples parmi tant d'autres : [3] [4]

Je vois aussi que vous déplacez les nœuds des lieux (villages, villes...) qui sont au centre hors de votre périmètre, ce qui n'est pas correct. Les nœuds de lieux devraient être au centre de la population correspondante.

Vous prétendez utiliser Maxar comme source, alors que Maxar a retiré son autorisation d'utiliser ses images pour la cartographie dans OSM il y a un an. Avez-vous l'autorisation d'utiliser ces images satellite ?

Vos commentaires ne sont pas conformes aux lignes directrices pour de bons commentaires sur les ensembles de changements. [5]

S'il vous plaît : vous devriez arrêter complètement de cartographier pour le moment, et chercher de l'aide auprès de la communauté guinéenne de cartographie OSM, afin que vous appreniez bien et que vos efforts soient utiles, car la plupart des objets que vous avez téléchargés devront être effacés/corrigiés, ce qui est un travail énorme.

Bien à vous,

Rafael Avila Coya.

[1] way/1293036908
[2] way/1293061727
[3] way/1231779043
[4] way/1231779044
[5] osm.wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications

Dear Nathan_A_RF:

The area:highway=* tag is widely used worldwide in all continents, to tag areas occupied by different highways. There is some controversy with highways that have a constant width, that in that case it might be redundant, but anyhow, as user rskedgell points to you, you should always contact the involved users before you mass delete features/geometries that you may think aren't needed or too old, but they are actually quite normal and give information.

I guess many if not all of those geometries should be back in the map.

Best regards,

Rafael Avila Coya, on behalf of the OSM Foundation, Data Working Group.

[Ticket#2024022910000165]

Hola. Debes dejar comentarios que informen de qué estás editando.

asdf no significa nada, ni aporta información ninguna.

Hola. Deberías ser un poco más explícito en los comentarios de los conjuntos de cambios. "Valle" no aporta ninguna información.

Dear justinvickers987,

We have received a complaint telling you have deleted lots of objects, like roads, without explanation.

Could you give us feedback on what you have done and why?

Best regards,

Rafael Avila Coya, OSMF DWG

[Ticket#2024022610000091]

Prezado JAILTON OLIVEIRA CUNHA,

Você está sendo questionado sobre uma possível violação de direitos autorais ao usar dados do Google em muitas de suas edições na área de Salvador da Bahia.

Por favor, pare de mapear e nos dê um retorno o mais rápido possível.

O uso de dados de terceiros para os quais não temos permissão é estritamente proibido no OpenStreetMap.

Com os melhores cumprimentos,

Rafael Avila Coya, em nome da Fundação OSM, Grupo de Trabalho de Dados.

[Ticket#2023050310000352]

Dear JAILTON OLIVEIRA CUNHA,

You are being asked about a possible copyright infringement by using Google data in many of your edits in Salvador de Bahía area.

Please, stop mapping and give us feedback as soon as possible.

Using 3rd party data for which we don't have permission is strictly forbidden in OpenStreetMap.

Best regards,

Rafael Avila Coya, on behalf of the OSM Foundation, Data Working Group.

[Ticket#2023050310000352]

Les 3 points d'intérêt à Lonjamuzi, pas avenue de la Victoire.

Thanks for the answer, and happy mapping ;)

Dear darkemyst,

Thank you for your mapping efforts in the city of Denver.

You are getting some questions from user jjyach, who is worried about the tagging of some cycle and foot paths in the area of Denver.

Please, kindly answer these questions to give some feedback to the community about your edits.

Rafael Avila Coya, on behalf of the OpenStreetMap Foundation, Data Working Group.

[Ticket#2023102410000339]

Dear MenKauRa,

Old names don't have to be deleted. We have a good naming system that allows keeping old names in the database. We have old_name=* tag and name:az, name:hy, name:ru for different languages.

Please, stick to the reality on the ground while you make changes. Vandalism in the area is high these days, and we don't want to revert any changeset just for being suspect of vandalism.

Best regards,

Rafael Avila Coya, on behalf of the OpenStreetMap Foundation, Data Working Group.

Dear *Frank212,

Please answer the questions from Kadubei, before you continue mapping.

Deleting names is not generally acceptable, because we lose information.

We have a good naming system to accommodate names in different languages. For instance, for this area, we have the name:hy for Armenian language and name:az for Azeri language.

This area is under closed surveillance due to the recent events in Nagorno-Karabakh and some vandalism by different users.

Best regards,

Rafael Avila Coya, on behalf of the OpenStreetMap Foundation, Data Working Group.

Reverted for mass vandalism.
DWG Ticket#2023102110000246
changeset/142963721

Dear Chrissooo,

It's more than a month ago that you received the comments of these two users about the non-ideal deletion of tracks inside the Dandenong Ranges National Park, paths that are forbidden and out of limits to visitors.

While we all understand clearly the reasons behind these deletions, user aharvey has also told you that, instead of deleting tracks that do exist on the ground, we have a rich tagging system that allows us to keep those tracks information in the OSM database while having the apps not to show them for visitors.

Instead of following those local Australian community tagging conventions, you have continued to delete tracks until these last days. Just few days ago we have received a complaint from yet another user telling you are deleting tracks from the database.

I kindly invite you to engage in a discussion with the involved users, so that all together we can find the best solution to this matter, that is not a serious nor difficult one to solve.

Best regards,

Rafael Avila Coya, on behalf of the OpenStreetMap Foundation, Data Working Group.

[Ticket#2023102110000175 — Issue #27884]

Dear Ramying and Friniate:

I kindly invite you to discuss over this naming issue (an ongoing discussion in the OSM community forum might be a good place [1], or any other forum as far as it is open), instead of initiating any edit war over this issue, that is always unacceptable.

Dear Ramying: Please answer this changeset question by Friniate so we may have your opinion.

Best Regards,

Rafael Avila Coya, on behalf of the OSM Foundation, Data Working Group.

[Ticket#2023091710000122]

[1] https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/old-italian-and-german-toponyms-in-slovenia/102062