@DaveSchweisguth Fair enough, sounds good. I think the ref is more useful than the name for turn directions for non-local travelers, but usually routing tools list both so that's probably fine. Also the Boontling name for this road is hilarious, thanks for adding it :)

Does "Boonville Road" / "Boonville Ukiah Road" appear on any street signs? I cannot immediately find any such signage in Boonville or Ukiah. If not, noname:yes might be more appropriate for this state route with signed number but no signed name.

I should note also that this change has made its way downstream into RideWithGPS and is currently making it impossible to correctly draw bike routes northbound over Camino Alto.

I would not represent the bike infrastructure on Camino Alto this way. From cycleway=* : "The cycleway=* tagging is used on linear features tagged with highway=* to map cycling infrastructure that is an inherent part of the road. This specifically applies to: cycle lanes which are part of the road without any physical separation from the other lanes except the painting on the road (don't map them as separate ways)..." And indeed, the bike lanes on Camino Alto are standard (class II) bike lanes separated from car lanes only by paint.

I think this changeset should be reverted, because bicycles are definitely permitted on Camino Alto. Did you mean instead to correct information on whether bike lanes are present on these ways? (They mostly are.)