Ise leian, et tegu sellise pisiasjaga, mis suuremat tähelepanu ei vaja :)

Aga kui kellelgi on konkreetne soovitus, mis kujul need sildid olema peaks, siis saan neid endiselt korraga muuta.

There could be some car shops that specialize on diagnostics services. I don't know if this is a case of this "Raua Auto" but this kind of automated edit could be potentially dangerous.

Hi! Is there a specific reason why you removed service:vehicle:diagnostics tag and not replaced it with a "better" tag? While there is no wiki documentation, it is commonly used tag:

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/service%3Avehicle%3Adiagnostics#chronology

Minu arvates on kõige olulisem see, et Apirnus viitsis süstemaatiliselt kõik need 100 infotahvlit ära kaardistada ning lisaks on ka kõik sildid ühtlase kujuga.

Tulles aga tagasi võimalike muudatuste juurde, siis üks pikk board:title või board:title + description on minu arvates mõlemad aktsepteeritavad variandid, aga pole kindel, kas need just selgemad või korrektsemad on.

Tagging for the renderer - ise leian, et teataivad mööndusi võib siin teha, kui see parandab lõppkasutaja kasutamiskogemust ning siltide kasutus pole seejuures otseselt vale. Kiire test näitas, et selliseid kaarte on rohkem kui üks, kus infotahvlite puhul name'i näidatakse aga board:title silti mitte. See muidugi ei tähenda seda, et sellised näited parandamist ei vajaks:

node/8277757331
node/8277757332

Pikse, ehk oskad ka omalt poolt tuua reaalse soovituse/näite loo 1 kohta, mis kujul sildid olla võiks? Ning kas kõik 5 infokildu peaks olema esindatud?

PS: Aasta on juba RMK pealkirja nimetuses sees. Tõin selle eraldi välja, sest üksikutel juhtudel oli selle kasutamise kuju ebaühtlane, mille ma omakäeliselt ära parandasin.

Järjekorra numbri lisamine pole probleem, aga ega mina ka ei tea mis kujul see olla võiks. Vb midagi sellist:

"Lugu " + järjekorra number + ": " + aasta + " – " + pealkirja tekst

ehk #1 board:title oleks "Lugu 1: 1938 – Peraküla saetööstuse kõrgaeg, import Inglismaale"?

Samas selline pikk pealkiri võib kohmakaks jääda.

Ühtlustasin silte: changeset/134471348

Pikse, nende infotahvlite kohta on 5 erinevat infokillukest. Lugu #1 näide:

üldnimetus: 100 lugu matkateelt
järjekorra number: 1
aasta: 1938
pealkirja tekst: Peraküla saetööstuse kõrgaeg, import Inglismaale
url: https://rmk100.ee/100-lugu/1938-perakula-saetoostuse-korgaeg-import-inglismaale

Ning kõik sildid on hetkel sellised:
name=üldnimetus
board:title=aasta + " – " + pealkirja tekst
website=url

Kui leiad, et see sildistus ei sobi, siis vajadusel saab neid korraga väga lihtsalt ükskõik mis viisil muuta. Ma ise leian, et üldnimetuse kasutamine name's on vägagi sobilik.

No, I would use full url in website tag and then delete it from the source tag. If anybody needs to check the source, then it is already included in your changeset details. Let me know if you want to change anything, I can do bulk update very easily.

I personally don't see an issue using the name tag for classifying these information boards. But I do have a really minor suggestion - maybe it is better not to keep the same url in both source and website tags? To me it's just redundant. I'm not suggesting that you should manually change it now, but if you like I help by aligning it and make sure the url is only in a single tag.

It's just a matter of principle - OSM is not a suitable place for storing or sharing your personal favorite routes. There are so many better platforms for that.

PS: Maa-ameti maps are not always very accurate, especially when it comes to small paths and trails in the woods. In some cases OSM data can be better.

Yes, there are "Tasuja pst" signs between Mustakivi tee and Saaremaa pst sections.

If you want assess the reliability of Tallinna veebikaart then you can download GIS files with additional metadata:
https://www.tallinn.ee/et/geoportaal/ruumiandmed

FYI - from the website it looks like they have moved to new location: Asume uuel aadressil:Nuia 16-1

Tasuja pst - I have surveyed it and I can confirm there are street signs on the non-motor traffic sections of the "highway".

It is also listed in kohanimeregister:
https://xgis.maaamet.ee/knravalik/knr?obj_id=100262799

Not sure why it's not properly listed in Teeregister.

gis.tallinn.ee/veebikaart - this is completely separate source. In some instances it can have more detailed and more accurate information than Maa-amet. But the license is currently not compatible with OSM, since it requires attribution: https://www.tallinn.ee/et/geoportaal/geoportaali-litsentsileping

If you don't believe me go ahead and survey the sign :) There is an additional 891b tahvel in there - Liiklusmärkide ja teemärgiste tähendused ning nõuded fooridele §21p29
https://www.riigiteataja.ee/aktilisa/1231/2202/0002/Lisa_8.pdf

qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq, thanks! The service road 1155605661 solves the routing issue.

Cycling through the Vabaduse väljak is definitely not prohibited!

The sign probably refers to wide rickshaw types bikes and not regular bikes:
https://news.err.ee/840310/tallinn-city-council-to-introduce-new-bicycle-rickshaw-regulations-in-july

I try to use common sense - when there is a bike parking infrastructure then it also must be routable by bike:
node/9998188475

Please use amenity=pharmacy and healthcare=pharmacy tags for only pharmacies. Shops like "Looduse Abi", that sell cosmetics, nutritional supplements and other health products, are not pharmacies and should be tagged with something else like shop=nutrition_supplements or shop=chemist

Another issue I noticed - cycleway 1155390144 is not routable from one end.

qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq, maybe you can answer, what is the best way to connect node/10744861718 to the rest of the road network:

a) connect the end directly to Pärnu mnt
b) connect it to the footway network and make sure the section that crosses the Pärnu mnt until way/987191893 is routable/has bicycle=yes tag?

Please don't use production environment of testing. There are dev servers for that: https://apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/

Please make sure not add duplicate pharmacies! For example "Tartu Sõbra Apteek" was already in OSM as a way: 278982491

Currently I deleted the node/7755823575 for this pharmacy.