OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
176667472 about 20 hours ago

## REVERTED CHANGESET
"education=school" removed from nodes that are not schools.

Referring to the discussion here: changeset/176667472

(This is a standard notice put on every reverted changeset, to inform other maintainers that the problem has been solved.)

--

Tous les changements d'aujourd'hui ont été corrigés (nodes), les ways sont inchangés. Bonne continuation sur OSM.

176667480 about 20 hours ago

## REVERTED CHANGESET
"education=school" removed from nodes that are not schools.

Referring to the discussion here: changeset/176667472

(This is a standard notice put on every reverted changeset, to inform other maintainers that the problem has been solved.)

176667584 about 20 hours ago

## REVERTED CHANGESET
"education=school" removed from nodes that are not schools.

Referring to the discussion here: changeset/176667472

(This is a standard notice put on every reverted changeset, to inform other maintainers that the problem has been solved.)

176667595 about 20 hours ago

## REVERTED CHANGESET
"education=school" removed from nodes that are not schools.

Referring to the discussion here: changeset/176667472

(This is a standard notice put on every reverted changeset, to inform other maintainers that the problem has been solved.)

176667606 about 20 hours ago

## REVERTED CHANGESET
"education=school" removed from nodes that are not schools.

Referring to the discussion here: changeset/176667472

(This is a standard notice put on every reverted changeset, to inform other maintainers that the problem has been solved.)

176667617 about 20 hours ago

## REVERTED CHANGESET
"education=school" removed from nodes that are not schools.

Referring to the discussion here: changeset/176667472

(This is a standard notice I plan to put on every reverted changeset, to inform other maintainers that the problem has been solved.)

176671800 about 20 hours ago

## REVERTED CHANGESET
"education=school" removed from nodes that are not schools.

Referring to the discussion here: changeset/176667472

(This is a standard notice I plan to put on every reverted changeset, to inform other maintainers that the problem has been solved.)

176667472 about 22 hours ago

Le tag "education=school" doit aller _uniquement_ sur les écoles.

Pas sur tous les nœuds composant le contour de l'établissement ! Par exemple ici : node/444590494

SVP ne plus ajouter ce tag de manière automatique partout sans regarder. Ne pas réparer vous-même, on va s'en charger.

176667617 about 23 hours ago

⚠️ You did it wrong!
Please do not do "select all" in JOSM before applying a tag.
You mistakenly added "education=school" to more than 9,000 nodes, most of which being the edges of landuse areas, edge of buildings or amenities.
This changeset must be immediately reverted.

176662982 1 day ago

Hello,

Thanks for this. Was the name of the market only signed in French? I don’t recall spotting a sign with a name here, so it must have been added quite recently. Do you remember what was written on the sign?
Thanks in advance.

176261246 7 days ago

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Even if we appreciate the effort to add buildings, could you please NEVER trace buildings from aerial pictures.

Aerial pictures show a distorted view of the reality, those images are ok for roads, grass and the like, but they are not suited for structures that are higher than the ground.

Please use "SPW(allonie) PICC numerical imagery" in the editor if you touch buildings.

I spend a lot of time today to repair most of the houses + more damage in other changes like this church (way/479683515) or this school (way/479683515).

I felt I had to warn you. This is a frequent mistake by people in their early contributions. Better take good habits early, because repairing faulty edits takes a lot of time.

Thanks in advance and happy mapping.

176392032 7 days ago

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Nice idea to add more buildings.

Before you continue, please read this warning. It looks like you are tracing from aerial images. This is not correct.

We should never do this on OSM. At least never in developed countries like Belgium.

If you want to add houses, please always trace on "Digitaal Vlaanderen GRB" background. This is the basemap showing the correct location of buildings. If you use the online editor, there is a "Background" button on the right-side of the screen. Use this to change the layer and scroll down until you get the correct basemap.

Thanks in advance.

176392154 7 days ago

## REVERTED CHANGESET

The plumber has been remapped as a single node. OSM is not a place for spam or advertising, we only use fair description of services.
node/13404233609

176333657 8 days ago

Thanks for this.

But when you do this, always make sure to tag it as private. By default, swimming pools are shown as open to anyone, which is probably not the case here.

176209357 11 days ago

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Even if the intentions are good, there are a few problems with this changeset.

First, it is better to upload changes per area (Kortrijk area as one single change, Leuven area as a single change) and not in bulk.

Removing pedestrians access from major roads can make sense to improve navigation suggestions… but if you set `foot=no` on a road without drawing dedicated ways which pedestrians may use, you will end up with broken routing. As a consequence, the software will indeed not use the road… but won’t find an alternative and won’t route through this area at all, sometimes getting people to walk large detours. Doing this will be worse than the previous situation. That is why we usually consider it not to be accessible to enforce strict access permissions without providing alternative routing.

One more thing: access permissions are cascaded. You added `access=no` here: way/1428153617/history to bar people from entering… but if `foot=permissive` and `bicycle=permissive` are still set, navigation software will take those values and will still allow routing. I don’t know this park but if it *really* closed to everyone, then you might want to set `access=no` and remove the other permissions.

Happy mapping.

176201507 11 days ago

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

railway:etcs=* should not be used on relations.

Relations are special objects used to group various parts of a railway line. Relations do not contain railway-specific data (like gauge, signalling-type or ECTS).

If you want to add the ECTS data to tracks, fine, but please:

1) Coordinate with people already doing this effort. Users like @JJJWegdam or @Sikal are already importing/updating this data. Make sure you all use the same tagging conventions.

2) Add details on the railway tracks themselves.

Thanks in advance.

175940538 12 days ago

Hello,

For the record, names in Australia are in English by default. There is no need to add "English translations" by duplicating the exact same data.

way/1017037544/history
You added "name:en"="Long Gully" to this cycle track… but the "name" tag was already set with this name.

way/797751493/history
You added "name:en"="Parmalat Ltd." to this area… but the "name" tag was already set with this name.

Same for way/684286896/history and countless others I will not mention.

Could you please also use real changeset titles, accurately describing the content of each edit.

Using a generic title like "Modified places and roads" for every single edit—and you uploaded several hundreds, possibly thousands edits with an identical description—helps no-one and makes your edits look suspicious, as if you are trying to hide something.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks in advance.

138422824 13 days ago

@Bear-in-a-box: What is the sense of writing such a changeset comment here? I don’t see anything wrong with this changeset.

You seem willing to add "animal=horse_walker" to several buildings, as you did later here: way/226239974/history

While this is a good improvement, I still do not understand the point in criticizing this changeset here, which was exclusively focused on refining the outline of landuse areas here. This is not the changeset that created the building, and even if it was, no-one should be blamed for not knowing the inner details of every building.

175944751 17 days ago

Hello,

Thanks for reviewing the temporary situation here.

Setting "motor_vehicle=no" is enough. There is no need to add "foot=yes" and "bicycle=yes" explicitely when no tag forbids those means of transport, those tags just create confusion.
Don’t bother to fix this one, but please bear this in mind to improve your further edits.

Have a nice day.

149409636 19 days ago

This changeset was 18 months ago, I do not recall the details for every node, but this looks like a mistake.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2110048189479248
I fixed it, thanks.