why did you remove internet_access=wlan from the clinic node?

Happy mapping,
Udar

as I commented on the changeset comment on the changeset linked above, thank you so much for this.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

thank you so much for this.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

two things, first the name uses shortenings like NW for Northwest, in OSM names should not have these short codes in them, second this way is in between the carriageways of a road bus has a different name than the road it connects to on the other side of that road aka way/575127205.

Happy mapping,
Udar

as per https://go-ggi.com/weekend-closures-including-northbound-turnpike-connector/ and the Instagram video provided therein to me it seems like the shift to the east made in this changeset continues north to at minimum node/470536539. Please double check this area using that source and the Lyft proprietary sources (especially your imagery) and update the alignment of this (the Northbound ramp from I 95 North to Floridas Turnpike north). Thank you so much for the help in advance.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

This is still inside of the area of the road, please double check its position on aerial imagery and change the position to a more up to date position.

Happy mapping,
Udar

This is still inside of the area of the road, please double check its position on aerial imagery and change the position to a more up to date position.

Happy mapping,
Udar

This is still inside of the area of the road, please double check its position on aerial imagery and change the position to a more up to date position.

Happy mapping,
Udar

This is still inside of the area of the road, please double check its position on aerial imagery and change the position to a more up to date position.

Happy mapping,
Udar

looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

the only street level imagery that I could find showing the new bridge that is OSM license compliant is one from Mapillary going from I 95 Southbound to Palmetto Expressway West, that one does show it existing though it does not seem to be complete or have cars driving on it and is from June of this year. It is completely possible that it has opened since but I cannot find anything newer, including from official sources like FDOT. See https://go-ggi.com/news-events/ and https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3705085882979429&focus=photo&lat=25.930077767160995&lng=-80.21052437277604&z=19.23196096175664 .

Happy mapping,
Udar.

what is your source for this??

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

way/38549772 is secondary because it connects to other roads (residential and service) while way/439693075 doesn't have any other roads coming off of it, it is only there as a shortcut to get from the HEFT exit ramp to the entrance ramp or to get from Southwest 117th Avenue to the HEFT entrance ramp without having to go down to Southwest 152nd Street to get to it, it acts like a continuation of the exit ramp (as a ramp) its self and doesn't have any intersections that would lower it in the road hierarchy.
As for the second point I left most of my response to that on changeset/187486349 but I would like to point out that we do not map for the renderer, see osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer and osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer. It is ok if something looks a bit weird if that is the on the ground truth, in this example the lane marking I aligned everything to curved in significantly so I followed in. In my edit today I straightened it out a bit to avoid any future confusion but it still follows the line mostly.

Happy mapping,
Udar

a few issues here, first road centerline should not be attached to road markings (way/1549570037), second the exit ramp from HEFT to Southwest 120th Street was aligned to the correct road marking before this edit, I have moved it back and added placement=* to indicate this. Also next time you edit a crossing way where the crossing is a straight line (like way/1020084750) please make sure to straighten it before uploading (right click on the way and click on the "Straighten" button or use the shortcut "S".

Happy mapping,
Udar