Et Logo vun OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
175029273 about 7 hours ago

This one is node/851522242#map=19/51.917125/-0.658083 .
The query is an Overpass Turbo one for all examples of that spelling - it is useful for finding spelling errors where only a few are found.

176892302 about 22 hours ago

Thanks for that. However, you've said "the removal was due to us receiving user feedback" but not said what feedback you actually received?
I'm surprised that someone could send a message to a group of editors such as yourselves and have that taken at face value without any checking?

150897661 2 days ago

Except just now a bus has picked up at 2050 from EB.
Maybe stand in the middle and be prepared to run left or right?

126152086 3 days ago

OK - I've confirmed the name "Middlesmoor" matches the coordinates in the current version of the import spreadsheet that Welshie used (the original had the off by one error in it). I've updated the ref on the "real Micklefield" (which had the right name). The one below that ("MIDDLETON QUERNHOW/STW 54.2012 -1.49001") hasn't been added to OSM yet.

126152086 3 days ago

Thanks - I think that this one got missed because I think that people used the name in the overpass query when searching for data to fix!

163106660 3 days ago

Thanks!

176981135 3 days ago

Thanks. I'll let the dust settle before trying to join this up again - I suspect that there is more discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/heavy-handed-rework-of-barbican-london/140254 to come!

68350530 3 days ago

I've removed and redacted the ones that I could find.

68350530 3 days ago

You've said "Remove buildings that were uploaded twice. Remove private information such as if people own a mobile phone or a vehicle" but you've left the names, I think?

172383162 3 days ago

您好,

请问您能否解释一下为什么更改了阿鲁纳恰尔邦 way/470459862/history 上的“名称”标签?

此致,安迪

172383162 3 days ago

Hello,
Can you please explain why you changed the "name" tag on way/470459862/history in Arunachal Pradesh?
Best Regards,
Andy

169479111 3 days ago

Actually, one more question - I was wondering why node/4004988761/history got edited here?

169479111 3 days ago

"local" sounds better, but it's perfectly OK not to add a cuisine tag if one doesn't really apply.
For some I'm sure a cuisine will apply (for example node/6446051034 in Reading is a restaurant that is part of a social club / community centre, and that definitely has a specific cuisine).

175029273 3 days ago

I'm guessing that this and the others at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2iAx should be zebra not "zenra" :)

174707297 3 days ago

Erm, node/10804350642 has "no;yes" for crossing markings - I suspect that it should be one or the other!

175635126 3 days ago

I'm confused by "crossing=traffic_signals;uncontrolled" on node/91037215/history ? crossing=*?uselang=en-GB suggests that one tag means "traffic lights" and the other says "no traffic lights"?
Cheers,
Andy

169479111 3 days ago

If you've actually been to a place, and know what cuisine it serves, then please do add "cuisine=coffee_shop" (or whatever else would be appropriate). However, I don't think that "community_centre" is really a cuisine in its own right - it doesn't really help understand what is served.

177066259 3 days ago

Thanks!

176973595 3 days ago

Hello,
It looks like the Orange Way got a bit confused as a result of this https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2izw - I've rerouted it around the back of the college again like it was a couple of days ago https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2izv .
Best Regards,
Andy

169479111 4 days ago

Hello
A selection of things around Oxford https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2iz0 are now "cuisine=community_centre". Was that deliberate, or just an accident?
Best Regards,
Andy