Hallo, könnten Sie bitte genauer erläutern, was Sie hier genau behoben haben? Unter http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=176902709 sehe ich nur Löschungen, keine Korrekturen.
Viele Grüße, Andy

Hello,
Can you explain in more detail what you actually fixed here? If I look at http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=176902709 I only see deletions, not fixes.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Andy from the DWG here again (as also in changeset/139049543 ). The best way of tagging this is "highway=footway; footway=sidewalk". If you do that you don't need to worry about what it is a path for, so you don't need to add an explicit "access=no" tag to stop people driving on it.
Tagging of this sort of thing is being discussed on the UK forum; see e.g. at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-access-no-tagging-of-uk-public-rights-of-way/132798 . I'd definitely suggest putting forward your point of view there.

Thanks!

Thanks - that's fixed it: http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=31640

Thanks!

Thanks!

Thanks - based on that I've sent it to "yes"

Thanks!

Thanks!

I'm guessing that this might be a victim of the pesky "off by 1" error in the spreadsheet - This is allegedly "Micklefield" yet it is very near "Middlesmoor"!

Also a similar thing needs to happen to the Colne Valley Trail relation/12772894#map=17/51.509518/-0.549436 so that that doesn't have a gap in it.

(as it's not obvious how to add to a relation in iD)
Click on the bit of bridleway way/1299073967/history in iD, scroll down to the bottom at the left hand side, in "choose a parent relation" type in 31640 (you can get that number from the relations modified in this changeset below). Then hover over the newly added relation with the mouse so that it highlights it, and you can see that way/25690340/history needs splitting in two and the northern bit removing from the relation as well.

So I guess you just need to add way/1299073967 to the NCN61 relation?

Hello,
Just wondering - do you have any idea how NCN61 gets across the gap at relation/31640#map=17/51.509457/-0.549799 ?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
You wouldn't happen to know where NCN288 goes across the gaps that you can see at relation/21018#map=16/50.90742/-0.77630 by any chance?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
NCN13 used to take the cycleway north from the roundabout here: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ic8 but now no longer does? Is that deliberate (I know that Sustrans sometimes move things around)?
relation/10589635#map=17/51.587129/0.435709
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I've filled in a gap in Filled in gap in this part of the Lea Valley Walk (relation/14522347) based on the previous alignment https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ic7 . Do you happen to know if that is OK?
Best Regards,
Andy

Just for info, there's an extra "n" in the Enniskillen that is relation/20040754 - "Ennniskillen"

(and accidentially a fence near Amotherby)