Hello again Mikhail1412,
What was the source of names used in this changeset? If it was local survey, please say so. If if was something else, please say what it was.
Best Regards,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group
(asking because of unanswered questions at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2055614 and @Mikhail1412/blocks ).

Hello,
This edit looks just plain wrong. way/1034355697/history doesn't look like a residential road on either Bing or Maxar imagery, which you claim to have used here.
The original changeset changeset/117750726 (not by you) also looks completely at variance with the available imagery as well.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Hello SHARCRASH,
What evidence do you have that
way/965429633/history actually exists as something that someone on the ground would think was an actual highway?
Best Regards,
Andy, from OSM's Data Working Group.

Are you sure that way/987918919/history is wood rather than scrub? That is what it was originally mapped as, before it was changed to a building by mistake.

Your only change to way/1034067200/history was to add an "area=yes" tag. Why did you do this, and how does it relate to the changeset comment of "fixed incorrect tag "?

Please reply to the question above.

Please don't just use changeset comments like "fixed incorrect tag". As noted at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=12511042 , many of the changes you are making are NOT tag corrections.
In this example, how do you know what way/1029412550/history is? Have you visited the place?

Erm, @thelidarking has been blocked until they contact the DWG: osm.org/user_blocks/5535 - is that who you mean?

Who was it who hired you?
Editing of this sort in OpenStreetMap should follow https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines , so that everyone knows what's going on.

Hello indiasc,
Try saying a bit about what you're doing. If you're adding buildings from aerial imagery, then say that (people update OpenStreetMap in lots of ways, including from local survey). Your "imagery_used" says "Bing aerial imagery;.gpx data file" so that might suggest that you did a local survey - if you did, say that too.
Best Regards,
Andy

I see someone has marked way/715879092/history as private?

Hello again indiasc,

Please do square right-angle buildings after drawing with the "q" key, and do zoom in a bit more first.
Also please do include some actual words, not just hashtags, in your changeset comments.

Best Regards,
Andy
PS: As I mentioned mefore, any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.

Hello nickvet419,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.
There seems to have been a problem with this change. You've merged lots of waterway ways together (which results in the large number of way deletions below) and the tags on the deleted ways have been lost.
As an example way/965091105/history has been replaced by way/779003416 , but the tags that were on the previous ways have been changed or lost.
Do you believe that the tags were previously incorrect? If not, then this change will need to be undone - either you can do that manually, also ensuring that whatever changes you wanted to make are also not lost, or we can do that by a revert, and you'll need to reapply whatever changes you were trying to make again.
Please reply here at the earliest opportunity.
Best Regards,
Andy

(source=local_knowledge on the southern changes, obviously)

The 5 pit trail bit of this isn't signed, but the joined-up way there is the only way you can physically or legally do it by bike.

Hello indiasc and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
A couple of things - one is that if you're trying to draw buildings that are made up of right angles you can square them up after drawing with the "q" key. Also, it helps a lot if you zoom in more and slow down when you are adding buildings - they will be much more accurate.
Another thing to mention is to include some actual words, not just hashtags, in your changeset comments. Explain what your were doing so that other mappers, especially local ones, can understand your changes.
Best Regards,
Andy
PS: Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.

Пожалуйста, не используйте комментарий «исправление тега» каждый раз. Пожалуйста, объясните, с чего и на что вы изменили тег и почему.

Please don't use the comment "tag correction" every time. Please explain what you changed the tag from and to, and why.

Another Lachin Corridor shape question I'm afraid - is the "sawtooth" shape at relation/11905591#map=15/39.7034/46.6254 definitely OK? I've chhecked the node history, and the nodes were last changed in this changeset, so the answer is probably "yes", but thought that I had better ask.

Unlike the previous changeset, much more detail was already here (added by @DaveD I think).