Hello,
It looks like http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=346129277 isn't quite there yet - change:lanes and turn:lanes still look like they might have information from before they were merged in error.
I've reverted quite a few of these (see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/001302.html ) but I've not done this one because you've already mostly tidied it up.
Best Regards,
Andy

Also a few lit streets in York

Footpaths near Chop Gate, from survey

More Bilsdale, footpaths etc. from survey

I've changed
relation/5803817/history
OK

And checked the following:
relation/12474062
relation/12469931
relation/12461262
relation/11622230
OK

relation/11622228
OK After removing some other stragglers

relation/11622227
relation/11622218
relation/11622215
relation/11622214
relation/11282825
relation/10928787
relation/10926299
relation/10926298
relation/7063585
relation/7062710
relation/7058519
relation/7034764
relation/6929199
relation/6928939
relation/6928005
relation/6166997
relation/5803912
relation/5803817
relation/5595242
relation/5537914
relation/5300514
relation/4085165
relation/283732
relation/278664
OK

Checking the others:
6166995
5595242
10926299
OK

Finally, checking other relations on
way/372440830/history
No, check
way/955984584

Relation Dunfanaghy Superintendent Registrars District (11622228) (as outer)
Relation Dore (5537914) (as outer)
Relation Magheraclogher ED (12469931) (as outer)
Relation Annagary ED (6929199) (as outer)
Relation Dunfanaghy Poor Law Union (11622227) (as outer)
Relation Tullaghhobigly Parish (10926298) (as outer)
Relation Gweedore Registrars District (11622230) (as outer)
Relation Tullaghobegly (6166997) (as outer)
Relation Annagary ED (12461262) (as outer)
Relation Dunglow Registrars District (11622218) (as outer)
Relation Kilmacrenan (5803912) (as outer)
Relation Glenties Superintendent Registrars District (11622215) (as outer)
Relation Glenties Poor Law Union (11622214) (as outer)
Relation Magheraclogher ED (6928005) (as outer)

All these have been checked above.

Actually the second part - the first part was changeset/106300014 .

Just checking - are you sure way/177187768/history is Kwartel Street? Because there's one just to the west...

Hello,
As mentioned previously on changeset/106425749 it'd be great to know what is actually happening here. Changeset comments should explain a little bit about what you're mapping; you're here doesn't say anything at all. Please see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello JOYCE MARY_imports,

Thanks for your updates, but it'd be great to know what is actually happening here. Changeset comments should explain a little bit about what you're mapping; you're here doesn't say anything at all.
Can you explain why you deleted these buildings?
Best Regards,
Andy

Բարև քոչվոր հայերեն
Խնդրում ենք օգտագործել փոփոխությունների շտեմարանները, որոնք բացատրում են, թե իրականում ինչ եք փոխել և որոնք են ձեր աղբյուրները: Տե՛ս osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments.
Հարգանքներով
Էնդի

Hello Nomadic Armenian,
Please use changeset comments that explain what it was that you actually changed and what your sources were. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
Best Regards,
Andy

I notice that node/2669903811/history was deleted in changeset/105728891 . Should it be restored? Let me know if it should.

It's been suggested that "LIL" is "Lycee International de Londres" (way/465874035) and SNT is "Sciences Numeriques et Technologiques".
I think that OSM is covered by the SNT curriculum in France.

Hello GuerinetOscarSNTLIL, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

You've added this as a "place of worship" when it looks just like a house. If you edit it with the online editor, and click on "Place of Worship" at the left, you can search instead for "house" and it'll change it.

Also, as added you've included the garden. In OSM a house should only include the actual building.

Best Regards,

Andy

PS: Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.

Hello,
Andy from the OSM's Data Working Group here.
I'm currently trying to repair the road merge problems described at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/001302.html and noticed that the tags on http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=79636644 seem implausible. "lanes=4;2;3" has clearly been merged from several previous ways. Please check the historical data using overpass when you see tags like this.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello GJF85,
Please use changeset comments that explain what you did and what sort of things you are actually mapping. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more information.
Best Regards,
Andy

@BCNorwich There seem to be a few problems here, hence I've asked GraceGallagher to reply: osm.org/user_blocks/5118

I’ve now changed everything that was deleted in changeset/105985206 to access=private .
However, I don't know that I haven't mistagged any (as yet untagged in OSM) PRoWs, so access tags may need revision in line with that.
Also "private" may not be the correct access tags for all ways; "customers" may be better in some cases - please discuss.

I've reviewed osm.org/api/0.6/changeset/105986923/download to look for designation tags (there aren't any) of explicit foot, bicycle or horse tags (likewise).
Therefore this does seem to fit with the presumed intent of changeset/105985206 . However, I don't know that I haven't mistagged any (as yet untagged in OSM) PRoWs, so this changeset may need revision in line with that.
Also "private" may not be the correct access tags for all ways; "customers" may be better in some cases.

Henry,
I'm trying to help you here. Simply deleting everything again whilst I'm trying to set access tags etc. in line with your presumed wishes is extremely unhelpful.
"Just deleting everything" will not work - people will simply remap what they can see from aerial imagery (without access tags).
Best Regards,
Andy