@BCNorwich For completeness, the roundabout here was a complete fantasy.

Hello,
Just to let you know - if you're participating in organised editing as part of Climate Trace you'll need to update your profile in the same way that @isabellasr has.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Just to let you know - if you're participating in organised editing as part of Climate Trace you'll need to update your profile in the same way that @isabellasr has.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Just to let you know - if you're participating in organised editing as part of Climate Trace you'll need to update your profile in the same way that @isabellasr has.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Just to let you know - if you're participating in organised editing as part of Climate Trace you'll need to update your profile in the same way that @isabellasr has.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Just to let you know - if you're participating in organised editing as part of Climate Trace you'll need to update your profile in the same way that @isabellasr has.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Just to let you know - if you're participating in organised editing as part of Climate Trace you'll need to update your profile in the same way that @isabellasr has.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Just to let you know - if you're participating in organised editing as part of Climate Trace you'll need to update your profile in the same way that @isabellasr has.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello tjnakano,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here. To confrm what okadatsuneo said above, you can't use any Google Maps as a source for OSM. We'll need to go though previous changes and undo those where you have used Google as a source (if any).
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello Joseph,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.
I can see that lots of users have been in contact with you at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10944197 , and you've replied to some of their comments.
However, you do seem to be making lots of edits that other people have problems with.
What I'd suggest that you do is to slow down in your mapping a bit, and after you've done something new ask people if they think it's OK before moving on to the next thing.
Another thing that would be a really good idea would be to talk more with the other people making these sorts of edits. There's lots of this sort of discussion going on at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ , and there's also a mailing list at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us .
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello ridethehighway65, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
The comment that you've used on this changeset is just "smg5". That doesn't really explain to other people what you were changing, why, or what the source was.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments has a bit more information.
Best Regards,
Andy

This follows on from changeset/105565855 also deals with other node change fails in there too, retracing from allowable imagery.

Had I got back to it before the changeset auto-closed, I'd have written:
Force-deleting some ways that were missed by changeset/105567773 (following a report to the DWG, reverting some edits based on SP MANWEB data).

This is also "Acaster Malbis, from survey", like the last one was.

નમસ્તે,
મને નથી લાગતું કે way/948520500 અહીં કોઈ બિલ્ડિંગને અનુરૂપ છે?
કૃપા કરીને પૂછો કે તમને કોઈ પ્રશ્નો થયા છે કે નહીં.
શ્રેષ્ઠ શુભેચ્છા,
એન્ડી

Hello,
I don't think that way/948520500 corresponds to a building at all here?
Please ask if you've got any questions.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Just for info, the merge of Crawley Road here introduced an extra "spur" into the boundary of the "Dedham Vale AONB" (9336585) relation, so that afterwards it looked like https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/17TQ . I've fixed that now so it's back to the same shape as it was. One part of Crawley Road should be in the relation and one part shouldn't, so I've split it in two.
Similarly the St Edmund Way (358939) - which also follows part of Crawley Road - needs the road to be split further to the south as well.
I hope this all makes sense - if not (or if you've got any other questions) please don't hesitate to ask!
Best Regards,
Andy

This also snips off a couple of similar spurs from relation/358939 , which also appear to have been introduced by merging.

Hello,
I guess that "carpot" should perhaps be "carport" on way/177262683 perhaps?
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks for fixing this!