This fixes the following diffs:

1078a1079
> -10866899 | Nurney Parish
1139a1141
> -10853102 | Staplestown Parish
1606c1608
< (1603 rows)
---
> (1605 rows)

2465a2466
> -2294354 | Tullowmagimma
2467a2469
> -2285011 | Nurney
2509c2511
< (2506 rows)
---
> (2508 rows)

322a323,324
> -2263043 | Idrone East
> -2263026 | Carlow
328c330
< (325 rows)
---
> (327 rows)

And also the following other relations using the "short cut":
2263027
7670447
11791302
11096770
11795766
8320493
2264816

(one other problem in the latter, see next changeset)

osm.wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments

Привет Кст
Пожалуйста, поделитесь с нами комментариями, которые объясняют другим картографам вносимые вами изменения, а не просто цифру «1».
Наилучшие пожелания,
Энди

Hello Кст
Please us comments that explain to other mappers the changes that you are making, not just "1".
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,

way/946038213 is just the latest example, but it doesn't seem to match any available imagery.

You have been contact about this many times in the past. It looks as if we'll need to revert all your edits so that other people can map the relevant features accurately.

Separately at osm.org/user_blocks/5066 you've been asked to email the DWG to discuss your edits - we'll give you a day or so to do that, and if we don't hear from you we'll have to revert them.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Hi,

In the absence of any other information, it looks like we'll have to revert these edits.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Hello,
Are all the street names around way/685340587 really called "Q"? It sounds odd, but I presume anything is possible?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
You've named a building in this area "Q", way/939355104. Was that deliberate or were you just trying to making it rectangular?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
You've named a building in this area "Q", way/775598056. Was that deliberate or were you just trying to making it rectangular? Also "Common hourse" seems an unlikely name?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
You've named a building in this area "Q", way/913560110 . Was that deliberate or were you just trying to making it rectangular?
Best Regards,
Andy

I've removed the name "Q" from way/938058026 because in the light of osm.org/user_blocks/5061 et al it's not very likely!

Hello,
You've named a building in this area "Q", way/942600678 . Was that deliberate or were you just trying to making it rectangular?
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks for tidying up the motorway way/929565745/history here!
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks for tidying these things up. From the context, I know what "#microncleanup" means, but I bet that in 6 months everyone will have forgotten. It'd be great to try and use a few more words in changesets so that everyone can see the sort of edits you're making here.
Best Regards,
Andy

Oops! Wrong account. Should have been reverted from "SomeoneElse_Revert".

This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 101689804, 102464837, 102511760, 102511806, 102511871, 102512008, 102512041, 102512135, 102512148, 102512175, 102512202, 102512216, 102512252, 102512279, 102512303, 102512384, 102512444, 102512458, 102512471, 102512489, 102512511, 102512527, 102512577, 102512594, 102512652, 102512686, 102512711, 102512741, 102512754, 102512765, 102512772, 102512809, 102512832, 102512867, 102540761, 102541057, 102541180, 102541248, 102541290, 102541365, 102541455, 102541557, 102541636, 102541684, 102541736, 102541791, 102541872, 102541936, 102542003, 102542245, 102542387, 102542622, 102542705, 102542780, 102542901, 102543095, 102595900, 102596024, 102596103, 102596123, 102596133, 102596148, 102596160, 102596177, 102596194, 102596207, 102596847, 102596904, 102596915, 102596933, 102597072, 102597117, 102597202, 102597275, 102597301, 102597316, 102597430, 102597495, 102598495, 102618299, 102619327, 102620798, 102780253, 102780306, 102780655, 102782251, 102832576, 102835653.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.