Hi - something went a bit wrong with node/2251189832 here (a zebra crossing within a station in Croydon, England). It somehow got joined to a railway line. I've unjoined it.

Is Juiz de Fora station currently in use or not? way/322262622 has a "disused=yes" tag on it. If it's really not a railway station any more, it might be better to tag as "disused:railway=station" instead - that way maps that aren't looking for the "disused" tag won't inadvertantly display it as a station.

Unfortunately you've fallen foul of te Bing offset here with way/322399812 too - have a look at the underlying GPS traces.

There are actually quite a lot more trees here than when it was first mapped (2009-2011 I think), and also more than is shown on the imagery at e.g. way/308480156 .

Also, you've moved the road into the wood here. The Bing imagery is offset by about 10m NS here, so everything you've traced without survey will be 10m out.

Maybe it might be better to revert this changeset and start from scratch (i.e. survey the park extent properly, avoid creating duplicate nodes and add any new features in the right place?

Also node/3291644911 is one of a large number of duplicate nodes south of Lady Spencer's Walk

Most of what's been added as park here isn't. The area behind the house and formal gardens is farmland; so is most of te area to the north.

(just in case you hadn't spotted) a couple of the "bogus glaciers" are actually probably ice cream shops ("glacier"=="ice cream shop" in French) e.g. for example way/174091474/history .

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I notice in this changeset you added a motorway to the middle of the Atlantic. I'm guessing (unless there's a movie villain's Evil Lair under there) that in reality it doesn't exist. If you want to test things, it's better to do so using http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org (a separate test system - you'll need to create a separate account there). That way no-one will complain about you adding things that don't exist!

Hi - just for info, something went a bit wrong here and node/3280613361/history was added at latitude 0, longitude 0. I deleted it.

Hi - just for info, something went a bit wrong here and node/3287327184/history was added at latitude 0, longitude 0. I deleted it.

Hi - just for info, something went a bit wrong here and node/3283522979/history was added at latitude 0, longitude 0. I deleted it.

Hi - just wondered if you'd meant to change node/2507900400/history back to office=software as well as the others?

How do you know that all of these roads marked as private are actually service roads?

I've had a go at tidying this up. The surveyed footpaths and tracks are now mostly correct again (though see note/301067). The rail lines mostly match now, although the the colliery line needs locating properly on the main road by GPS (not Bing as it's misaligned here). Hedges and Fences need surveying properly and the "landuse=railway" is something of a work of fiction.

19 Oct

Is the operator on node/667486663/history correct? When I was in Ashbourne at the back end of last year I think that there was a sign up saying that it had changed hands.

Hehe - so situation normal in the US (struggling to find a local mapper)!

No problem - I've deleted the extra points. If you want a map showing power lines at lower zoom levels I'm sure someone's already done one somewhere (or you could try something like umap.openstreetmap.fr, or trying your own version of the OSM standard style).

Just wondering if the western end of Applemarket street is perhaps best described as a highway=pedestrian rather than a highway=footway? If it's a former road that is now foot traffic only, pedestrian might be better.

Have you checked the wall of the store? If so, we can stop worrying :)

Copyright law in the UK is different to the US (in the US you can't copyright a fact). In the UK the relevant legal term is "sweat of the brow" (if you throw that at a search engine you should get the background). There are also "database" rights to consider here (and in the rest of the EU).