(Anknüpfend an osm.org/user_blocks/19373)
Hallo, könnten Sie diese Änderungen bitte etwas genauer beschreiben? „Straßen aktualisiert (108 Änderungen)“ beschreibt nicht wirklich, was Sie getan haben und warum. Bitte geben Sie eine präzisere Beschreibung der vorgenommenen Änderungen an.
Viele Grüße, Andy von der OSM-Datenarbeitsgruppe

(follow-on from osm.org/user_blocks/19373)
Hello,
Can you describe these changes in a bit more detail? "Update roads (108 changes)" doesn't really describe what you did or why you did it - please use a better description of the changes that you were making.
Best Regards,
Andy, from OSM's Data Working Group.

Regarding rivers vs streams, I'd definitely suggest discussing it in the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/us/78 and get a third and more opinions!

Merhaba,
https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/653647238 adresine baktığımda, bina adını neden kaldırdığınızı merak ettim. Yanlış mıydı?

Saygılarımla

Hello,
From looking at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/653647238 , I just wondered why you removed the building name here. Was it wrong?
Best Regards

They have now...

This one is node/851522242#map=19/51.917125/-0.658083 .
The query is an Overpass Turbo one for all examples of that spelling - it is useful for finding spelling errors where only a few are found.

Thanks for that. However, you've said "the removal was due to us receiving user feedback" but not said what feedback you actually received?
I'm surprised that someone could send a message to a group of editors such as yourselves and have that taken at face value without any checking?

Except just now a bus has picked up at 2050 from EB.
Maybe stand in the middle and be prepared to run left or right?

OK - I've confirmed the name "Middlesmoor" matches the coordinates in the current version of the import spreadsheet that Welshie used (the original had the off by one error in it). I've updated the ref on the "real Micklefield" (which had the right name). The one below that ("MIDDLETON QUERNHOW/STW 54.2012 -1.49001") hasn't been added to OSM yet.

Thanks - I think that this one got missed because I think that people used the name in the overpass query when searching for data to fix!

Thanks!

Thanks. I'll let the dust settle before trying to join this up again - I suspect that there is more discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/heavy-handed-rework-of-barbican-london/140254 to come!

I've removed and redacted the ones that I could find.

You've said "Remove buildings that were uploaded twice. Remove private information such as if people own a mobile phone or a vehicle" but you've left the names, I think?

您好，

请问您能否解释一下为什么更改了阿鲁纳恰尔邦 way/470459862/history 上的“名称”标签？

此致，安迪

Hello,
Can you please explain why you changed the "name" tag on way/470459862/history in Arunachal Pradesh?
Best Regards,
Andy

Actually, one more question - I was wondering why node/4004988761/history got edited here?

"local" sounds better, but it's perfectly OK not to add a cuisine tag if one doesn't really apply.
For some I'm sure a cuisine will apply (for example node/6446051034 in Reading is a restaurant that is part of a social club / community centre, and that definitely has a specific cuisine).

I'm guessing that this and the others at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2iAx should be zebra not "zenra" :)