OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
165773220 10 days ago

Thanks!

176753352 10 days ago

Thanks!

126152086 10 days ago

I'm guessing that this might be a victim of the pesky "off by 1" error in the spreadsheet - This is allegedly "Micklefield" yet it is very near "Middlesmoor"!

176754510 11 days ago

Also a similar thing needs to happen to the Colne Valley Trail relation/12772894#map=17/51.509518/-0.549436 so that that doesn't have a gap in it.

176754510 11 days ago

(as it's not obvious how to add to a relation in iD)
Click on the bit of bridleway way/1299073967/history in iD, scroll down to the bottom at the left hand side, in "choose a parent relation" type in 31640 (you can get that number from the relations modified in this changeset below). Then hover over the newly added relation with the mouse so that it highlights it, and you can see that way/25690340/history needs splitting in two and the northern bit removing from the relation as well.

176754510 11 days ago

So I guess you just need to add way/1299073967 to the NCN61 relation?

176754510 11 days ago

Hello,
Just wondering - do you have any idea how NCN61 gets across the gap at relation/31640#map=17/51.509457/-0.549799 ?
Best Regards,
Andy

176753352 11 days ago

Hello,
You wouldn't happen to know where NCN288 goes across the gaps that you can see at relation/21018#map=16/50.90742/-0.77630 by any chance?
Best Regards,
Andy

176639876 12 days ago

Hello,
NCN13 used to take the cycleway north from the roundabout here: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ic8 but now no longer does? Is that deliberate (I know that Sustrans sometimes move things around)?
relation/10589635#map=17/51.587129/0.435709
Best Regards,
Andy

176667019 12 days ago

Hello,
I've filled in a gap in Filled in gap in this part of the Lea Valley Walk (relation/14522347) based on the previous alignment https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ic7 . Do you happen to know if that is OK?
Best Regards,
Andy

176755318 12 days ago

Just for info, there's an extra "n" in the Enniskillen that is relation/20040754 - "Ennniskillen"

176765756 12 days ago

(and accidentially a fence near Amotherby)

158941787 13 days ago

Hello,
ny idea what the wheelchair access to way/1332441985 is? I'm guessing that "noleisure=park" is just a typo.
Cheers,
Andy

172063630 13 days ago

way/183987771/history is wheelchair=yes;limited . Do you know which it is?

174508668 13 days ago

Hello,
way/788299903/history is now wheelchair=yes;limited - do you happen to know which it is?

163581779 13 days ago

way/293471983/history is now wheelchair=yes;limited - do you happen to know which it is?

161470070 13 days ago

Hello,
This is now wheelchair=yes;no . Do you have any idea which should it be?

165773220 13 days ago

Hello,
node/931633008/history is now wheelchair=yes;no . Do you have any idea which should it be?

31700165 13 days ago

Hello,
A merge somewhere has made way/132716669/history "wheelchair=yes;no". I'm guessing it should be one or the other?

176625259 13 days ago

If you download the relation as it was in Josm between changes you can see one of the problems:

[out:xml][timeout:90][date:"2025-12-26T23:00:00Z"];
(
relation(6270840);
);
(._;>;);
out meta;

There's a gap corresponding to the section under the N69. I've no idea why Josm would do this - it is very odd.

I added the two new missing ways a few days later:
https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/6270840