Also a similar thing needs to happen to the Colne Valley Trail relation/12772894#map=17/51.509518/-0.549436 so that that doesn't have a gap in it.

(as it's not obvious how to add to a relation in iD)
Click on the bit of bridleway way/1299073967/history in iD, scroll down to the bottom at the left hand side, in "choose a parent relation" type in 31640 (you can get that number from the relations modified in this changeset below). Then hover over the newly added relation with the mouse so that it highlights it, and you can see that way/25690340/history needs splitting in two and the northern bit removing from the relation as well.

So I guess you just need to add way/1299073967 to the NCN61 relation?

Hello,
Just wondering - do you have any idea how NCN61 gets across the gap at relation/31640#map=17/51.509457/-0.549799 ?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
You wouldn't happen to know where NCN288 goes across the gaps that you can see at relation/21018#map=16/50.90742/-0.77630 by any chance?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
NCN13 used to take the cycleway north from the roundabout here: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ic8 but now no longer does? Is that deliberate (I know that Sustrans sometimes move things around)?
relation/10589635#map=17/51.587129/0.435709
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I've filled in a gap in Filled in gap in this part of the Lea Valley Walk (relation/14522347) based on the previous alignment https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ic7 . Do you happen to know if that is OK?
Best Regards,
Andy

Just for info, there's an extra "n" in the Enniskillen that is relation/20040754 - "Ennniskillen"

(and accidentially a fence near Amotherby)

Hello,
ny idea what the wheelchair access to way/1332441985 is? I'm guessing that "noleisure=park" is just a typo.
Cheers,
Andy

way/183987771/history is wheelchair=yes;limited . Do you know which it is?

Hello,
way/788299903/history is now wheelchair=yes;limited - do you happen to know which it is?

way/293471983/history is now wheelchair=yes;limited - do you happen to know which it is?

Hello,
This is now wheelchair=yes;no . Do you have any idea which should it be?

Hello,
node/931633008/history is now wheelchair=yes;no . Do you have any idea which should it be?

Hello,
A merge somewhere has made way/132716669/history "wheelchair=yes;no". I'm guessing it should be one or the other?

If you download the relation as it was in Josm between changes you can see one of the problems:

[out:xml][timeout:90][date:"2025-12-26T23:00:00Z"];
(
relation(6270840);
);
(._;>;);
out meta;

There's a gap corresponding to the section under the N69. I've no idea why Josm would do this - it is very odd.

I added the two new missing ways a few days later:
https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/6270840

I've reverted this in changeset/176713986

Merci!

Hello,
Thanks for adding these to OpenStreetMap! A quick question about "Together for nepal office" node/6698508587 - what sort of office is it? Normally an office would have an "office=<something>" tag and value, where <something> is from the list at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/office#values . Perhaps "office=ngo" would work here ("ngo" stands for "non-governmental organisation")?
Best Regards,
Andy