Hello,
Just wondering - do you have any idea how NCN61 gets across the gap at relation/31640#map=17/51.509457/-0.549799 ?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
You wouldn't happen to know where NCN288 goes across the gaps that you can see at relation/21018#map=16/50.90742/-0.77630 by any chance?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
NCN13 used to take the cycleway north from the roundabout here: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ic8 but now no longer does? Is that deliberate (I know that Sustrans sometimes move things around)?
relation/10589635#map=17/51.587129/0.435709
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I've filled in a gap in Filled in gap in this part of the Lea Valley Walk (relation/14522347) based on the previous alignment https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ic7 . Do you happen to know if that is OK?
Best Regards,
Andy

Just for info, there's an extra "n" in the Enniskillen that is relation/20040754 - "Ennniskillen"

(and accidentially a fence near Amotherby)

Hello,
ny idea what the wheelchair access to way/1332441985 is? I'm guessing that "noleisure=park" is just a typo.
Cheers,
Andy

way/183987771/history is wheelchair=yes;limited . Do you know which it is?

Hello,
way/788299903/history is now wheelchair=yes;limited - do you happen to know which it is?

way/293471983/history is now wheelchair=yes;limited - do you happen to know which it is?

Hello,
This is now wheelchair=yes;no . Do you have any idea which should it be?

Hello,
node/931633008/history is now wheelchair=yes;no . Do you have any idea which should it be?

Hello,
A merge somewhere has made way/132716669/history "wheelchair=yes;no". I'm guessing it should be one or the other?

If you download the relation as it was in Josm between changes you can see one of the problems:

[out:xml][timeout:90][date:"2025-12-26T23:00:00Z"];
(
relation(6270840);
);
(._;>;);
out meta;

There's a gap corresponding to the section under the N69. I've no idea why Josm would do this - it is very odd.

I added the two new missing ways a few days later:
https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/6270840

I've reverted this in changeset/176713986

Merci!

Hello,
Thanks for adding these to OpenStreetMap! A quick question about "Together for nepal office" node/6698508587 - what sort of office is it? Normally an office would have an "office=<something>" tag and value, where <something> is from the list at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/office#values . Perhaps "office=ngo" would work here ("ngo" stands for "non-governmental organisation")?
Best Regards,
Andy

Bonjour,

Merci d'avoir ajouté ces informations à OpenStreetMap ! J'ai une petite question concernant « INSO » (way/192688218) : de quel type de bureau s'agit-il ? Normalement, un bureau possède une balise et une valeur de type « office=<quelque chose> », où <quelque chose> correspond à la liste disponible sur https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/office#values. Peut-être que « office=ngo » conviendrait ici (« ngo » signifiant « organisation non gouvernementale ») ?

Cordialement,

Andy

Hello,
Thanks for adding these to OpenStreetMap! A quick question about "The All Island Jamaica Cane Farmers' Association" - if you look at node/11049752768 you can see that it is between two buildings. I'm guessing that it is in the one to the northeast or the one to the northwest - do you happen to know which one it is?
Also, what sort of office is it? Normally an office would have an "office=<something>" tag and value, where <something> is from the list at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/office#values . Perhaps "office=ngo" would work here ("ngo" stands for "non-governmental organisation")?
Best Regards,
Andy

(re them not been broken now) I re-added them this morning - see e.g. changeset/176625259 .

> I don't know why a new river relation should affect any boundary relations

It was creating the "tunnels" under the bridges like way/1461940070/history that introduced the gaps. I'd have expected to add the new bit to the relations that of the old way it was split from, too.