OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
176639876 15 days ago

Hello,
NCN13 used to take the cycleway north from the roundabout here: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ic8 but now no longer does? Is that deliberate (I know that Sustrans sometimes move things around)?
relation/10589635#map=17/51.587129/0.435709
Best Regards,
Andy

176667019 15 days ago

Hello,
I've filled in a gap in Filled in gap in this part of the Lea Valley Walk (relation/14522347) based on the previous alignment https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ic7 . Do you happen to know if that is OK?
Best Regards,
Andy

176755318 15 days ago

Just for info, there's an extra "n" in the Enniskillen that is relation/20040754 - "Ennniskillen"

176765756 15 days ago

(and accidentially a fence near Amotherby)

158941787 16 days ago

Hello,
ny idea what the wheelchair access to way/1332441985 is? I'm guessing that "noleisure=park" is just a typo.
Cheers,
Andy

172063630 16 days ago

way/183987771/history is wheelchair=yes;limited . Do you know which it is?

174508668 16 days ago

Hello,
way/788299903/history is now wheelchair=yes;limited - do you happen to know which it is?

163581779 16 days ago

way/293471983/history is now wheelchair=yes;limited - do you happen to know which it is?

161470070 16 days ago

Hello,
This is now wheelchair=yes;no . Do you have any idea which should it be?

165773220 16 days ago

Hello,
node/931633008/history is now wheelchair=yes;no . Do you have any idea which should it be?

31700165 16 days ago

Hello,
A merge somewhere has made way/132716669/history "wheelchair=yes;no". I'm guessing it should be one or the other?

176625259 17 days ago

If you download the relation as it was in Josm between changes you can see one of the problems:

[out:xml][timeout:90][date:"2025-12-26T23:00:00Z"];
(
relation(6270840);
);
(._;>;);
out meta;

There's a gap corresponding to the section under the N69. I've no idea why Josm would do this - it is very odd.

I added the two new missing ways a few days later:
https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/6270840

176000512 17 days ago

I've reverted this in changeset/176713986

162161449 17 days ago

Merci!

73214440 18 days ago

Hello,
Thanks for adding these to OpenStreetMap! A quick question about "Together for nepal office" node/6698508587 - what sort of office is it? Normally an office would have an "office=<something>" tag and value, where <something> is from the list at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/office#values . Perhaps "office=ngo" would work here ("ngo" stands for "non-governmental organisation")?
Best Regards,
Andy

162161449 18 days ago

Bonjour,

Merci d'avoir ajouté ces informations à OpenStreetMap ! J'ai une petite question concernant « INSO » (way/192688218) : de quel type de bureau s'agit-il ? Normalement, un bureau possède une balise et une valeur de type « office=<quelque chose> », où <quelque chose> correspond à la liste disponible sur https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/office#values. Peut-être que « office=ngo » conviendrait ici (« ngo » signifiant « organisation non gouvernementale ») ?

Cordialement,

Andy

138590127 18 days ago

Hello,
Thanks for adding these to OpenStreetMap! A quick question about "The All Island Jamaica Cane Farmers' Association" - if you look at node/11049752768 you can see that it is between two buildings. I'm guessing that it is in the one to the northeast or the one to the northwest - do you happen to know which one it is?
Also, what sort of office is it? Normally an office would have an "office=<something>" tag and value, where <something> is from the list at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/office#values . Perhaps "office=ngo" would work here ("ngo" stands for "non-governmental organisation")?
Best Regards,
Andy

176460247 18 days ago

(re them not been broken now) I re-added them this morning - see e.g. changeset/176625259 .

> I don't know why a new river relation should affect any boundary relations

It was creating the "tunnels" under the bridges like way/1461940070/history that introduced the gaps. I'd have expected to add the new bit to the relations that of the old way it was split from, too.

176624097 19 days ago

Please see osm.org/user_blocks/19237 . Someone has already reverted these changes.

174595185 19 days ago

Yes - please do raise this specific issue in the forum.
Also, if you find yourself in a situation like https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/15921137 please NEVER continue the revert war. At best, you'll find yourself blocked for a period of time. You're actually very lucky that I did not do this this time.