SomeoneElse's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 175121940 | 23 days ago | Thanks! |
| 175024205 | 25 days ago | I've not been in for years but news reports suggest it was still there in at least 2023. |
| 174826705 | 25 days ago | Any reason why you've gone with amenity rather than man_made for these? Previously there were 70 uniquely man_made https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2g2d and 45 uniquely amenity https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2g2c , and 16 both https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2g2f . There are now 234 amenity, but the wiki page is against man_made osm.wiki/Tag%3Aman_made%3Dmounting_block
|
| 141768502 | 25 days ago | Thanks for fixing this. You've no idea if there's a diversion for the New River Path signposted, have you?
|
| 174882401 | 29 days ago | Re note/161072 , I'm not sure what the original issue was. 10 years ago it was like https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2fP3 . Since then way/763513258 as been added. According to local authority PRoW data it is a public footpath: https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#16/52.6415/-0.9379/H/P , but so are many others. |
| 174515494 | 29 days ago | OK, I've changed that back in changeset/174879700 . The previous conversation was in
|
| 174869981 | 29 days ago | Thanks! |
| 174664031 | about 1 month ago | Thanks - this matches my recollection.
|
| 174736769 | about 1 month ago | > would this be considered sufficient? Thanks - I now have one more object to keep an eye on, and something to point at when it changes. > @FILszew/history is one just appeared BTW Again, the same questions - what have they changed that does not match the Polish community's majority view of what road classes should be in Poland, and why? |
| 174736769 | about 1 month ago | Above I said "saying explicitly what is wrong with the way each user tagged them, why it was wrong, and if relevant where the Polish community decided that that tagging was wrong". Unfortunately, "more unexplained undiscussed nonsense trunk category changes" et al does not answer that. You have linked to exactly one OSM object above - https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/41189769 - and I presume you believe that "secondary" is correct there? Can you explain _why_ you believe that the majority of the Polish community think that and link to some documentation that I can read in the forum, the wiki or elsewhere? |
| 173284201 | about 1 month ago | Did that information take the form of an image or a site plan? If so, what was the licence associated with that? If not, what form did it take? |
| 174745634 | about 1 month ago | Please use meaningful changeset comments. "fix" doesn't really help anyone to understand what you were doing.
|
| 173364882 | about 1 month ago | Hello,
|
| 173284201 | about 1 month ago | Please tell us what source you used, otherwise we will have to revert this. |
| 174736769 | about 1 month ago | Hello, For info I have asked these accounts to contact us: osm.org/user_blocks/18959
Can you please give us an examples of problems with any of these users that you may be familiar with? It would help to refer to specific OSM objects (perhaps from the list in this changeset) and saying explicitly what is wrong with the way each user tagged them, why it was wrong, and if relevant where the Polish community decided that that tagging was wrong. Currently we have enough information to say "please contact us" but not any information about what they have done wrong. Best Regards,
|
| 172492316 | about 1 month ago | Thanks! |
| 174515494 | about 1 month ago | Just checking, is this OK?
|
| 174417785 | about 1 month ago | Thanks! |
| 174576603 | about 1 month ago | (from survey) |
| 83829448 | about 1 month ago | The English wikipedia is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frauenkirche,_Dresden and actually matches my recollection of English name usage. "Church of Our Lady" is in brackets on the first line as a translation, but the name Frauenkirche is used as the name subsequently.
|