Just checking, is this OK?
A local mapper remapped it recently to reflect some realignment due to ongoing work on the A30.
Appently it changes fairly regularly so I guess it might be back to this again...

Thanks!

(from survey)

The English wikipedia is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frauenkirche,_Dresden and actually matches my recollection of English name usage. "Church of Our Lady" is in brackets on the first line as a translation, but the name Frauenkirche is used as the name subsequently.
That approach is similar to other things that aren't translated into English, like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pont_Neuf .

Also Leeman Road in York.

Hello,
I think you accidentally added tracking information to the website - utm_source=local&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=oldbury .

Oops - the "website" added here seems to have tracking information in it "sc_cmp=ref*yg*stc*2428&utm_source=yext_google&utm_campaign=local_Express_&utm_medium=organic". Maybe just a cut and paste thing?

Hello,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here. Please don't add tracking links to OSM. As you will have noticed they get removed pretty quickly.
Untruths in changeset comments ("Added more information abou the store ") is also not appreciated.

... and Eurovelo 2 as well: relation/5479822#map=17/51.543533/-2.639439 .

Thanks for tidying this up.
You wouldn't happen to know if the NCN4 still routes through here? relation/1318928#map=17/51.544100/-2.640554 shows a gap, but it might just be all a building site...
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello "ThePigeonCompany15",
Can you explain what "England Update 1.4.3 (Do Not Change! penalty charge: £150,000)" means?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
You've added a name:en here of "Church of Our Lady" (which is a translation of the words in the German name), but in English I've always known it in English as the "Frauenkirche".
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks!

Also 05/11, Huntington, ts2365b

What source did you use? It surely wasn't Bing Maps Aerial...

Thanks!

Hello,
Do you fancy having a go at adding the roads to the west to the NCN so that it is continuous again? Currently there is a gap: relation/167055#map=17/50.317603/-5.082389
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks!

osmuser63783 is correct - this is not about crossings (continuous or otherwise). There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding by Facebook of how roads work in the UK.

@VLD319 when I was last in this bit of Manchester I crossed the M60 not at this interchange but at the one to the east. I can assure you that there the cycleways are all multi-use.
"foot" access in OSM should reflect legal access, and what Pete Owens says above is correct. If there is on-the-ground signage that says that a cycleway is cycle only then foot=no is correct, but if there isn't, it isn't.