If you search taginfo for a name of anything in OSM you'll be able to find it, so from https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=Starley+Regional+Cycle+Network#values you can click through to https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/description=Starley%20(TfWM)%20Regional%20Cycle%20Network%20(Proposed%20route) and from there there is an overpass turbo link to https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2dMV and if you click on that you get to relation/17077005#map=11/52.5080/-1.8073 . As clear as mud :)

Veuillez utiliser de meilleurs commentaires sur les ensembles de modifications. « À corriger » ne sert à rien.
Cordialement,
Andy Townsend, au nom du groupe de travail sur les données d'OSM

Please use better changeset comments. "À corriger " helps no-one.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

The bus bay isn't all the way up the street though? Where did you see the bus bay?

I've no idea what "Starley Network" is - can you link to it?
What is the link to the NCN5 that you can see?
In my comment above I've linked to two superroute relations that both claim to be NCN5, in this changeset you've modified both of those and a few routes that are constituents of them. I'm confused not because this is wrong but because I don't understand what they are :)

Pas de problème, je pense avoir corrigé les problèmes plus tôt

No problem - I think I've corrected the problems earlier

I'd definitely suggest adding "designation=core_path" where relevant, as per https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/designation=core_path .

I suspect that "yes" makes no more sense than "3" here. I suspect that "bus_bay" is a typing error for another tag, perhaps "width"?
The only way to be sure is to check with a local. When I see "obviously wrong values like "bus_bay=3" but can't see what the mapper obviously meant, I leave the errors as they are so that in future QA tools will still find them.

For now, please consider restricting yourself to edits that you have surveyed yourself in your own local town.
If we get further complaints we'll have to consider taking further action.

I don't know if you're crazy, but clearly you are incapable of understanding what people say to you in plain English.
In changeset/170858581 I said:
"Whenever you're thinking about making significant changes like this it's always a good idea to discuss with the relevant community.
In this case, asking about it at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/in/136 would have been a good idea."
The same applies here.
It also applies to https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/classification-of-us-route-50-in-nevada-and-whether-or-not-a-small-city-such-as-ely-is-a-trunk-destination/133312 , https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mountain-west-large-road-route-road-name-changes/132498 and https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/america-relation/136587 .

Thanks,
The conversations about this sort of mapping are still ongoing; it's definitely worth having a look in the forum.
Cheers,
Andy

For info this broke a couple of relations - I've fixed the ones I've found in changeset/173131453

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I've just noticed way/1436669796 - does it actually match what is actually on the ground here? It does not look like it from the imagery.
Best Regards,
Andy

Actually a few trees, and some hedges in Towthorpe

What tends to happen elsewhere is that you'd have a superroute for the "named route" (see for example relation/16327216 ) which has only relations as components - in my example relation/78028 (which is also a member of a European route) and relation/16327210 (which isn't part of anything else).
Northern Ireland has overcomplicated things a bit because there is relation/1015237 (a collection of all sorts) which contains various ones including Ulster Way (918951), which is contains a mixture of ways and relations.
It'd make it much easier if superroutes were created for the main named routes and the ways moved into them - that way the SRs for this and e.g. the Lecale Way would be much easier to process.
A challenge to do in iD, though...

Just wondered - what is the difference between relation/1015887 and relation/15481627 ?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/relation/15543659 is both "network=nwn" and "network:type=lwn". It looks pretty "local" to me; is there anything that I am missing?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
way/1394995446/history seems to be tagged as a "community_centre=community_hall" which seems odd?
Regards,
Andy

Well if there's a kerb on way/1435651892 that's worth mapping.
I've connected the relation up relation/357215#map=19/53.356102/-1.386084 - if someone was cycling northe or south along that I'm guessing that they'd have to get off the bike, push it across the road, and then get on at the other side?