Burley in Wharfdale, from survey 15/06/2025, ts1994b

Thanks!

Hello tomyak,
Please do use more descriptive changeset comments than just "updated" - it really will help other mappers to help you!
Best Regards,
Andy

?

Hello,
"Fareham Street" here has had "ford=yes" set here: https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/1164013794 . I'm guessing that that was a mistake and some other tag was made?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
The iD editor's brand suggestions are just that - suggestions.
Please don't apply them in places that you are not familiar with Quite a lot of the suggestions for brands have incorrect geographical areas or are just rubbish. The onus is always on the person accepting the suggestion to verify that it is correct
Best Regards,
Andy

User is blocked now for other reasons osm.org/user_blocks/18371 , DWG ticket 2025062010000323 .

Hello,
way/1396460767 was newly added in here, and looks like it should be added to the western bit of the C2C.
When adding new ways via Vespucci I don't know of an easy way to check what relations they "Should have been part of", so I tend to review for gaps when back at home.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You've deleted a few houses here - are they no longer standing?
Best Regards,
Andy

Wenn way/1384003260/history auf einer Karte über anderen Merkmalen angezeigt würde, obwohl es sich unterirdisch befindet, würde ich die Verwendung einer anderen Karte vorschlagen!

If way/1384003260/history was shown on a map above other features despite being underground I'd suggest using a different map!

Thanks for that!
Does that mean that the ways that are part of relation/13113383 could perhaps be moved to relation/31640 ?
There are a few other NCN routes that have several pieces like this (not for reasons of length), but I suspect that someone might consolidate them at some point.
The milepost (if it doesn't get moved) won't be the only one that's no longer 100% accurate after route moving / renaming!

Hello,
Just wondered - is relation/13113383#map=16/51.80928/-0.03301 part of relation/31640#map=16/51.80928/-0.03301 (or does the main route continue along the canal, past the NCN milepost node/160080113 )?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello Bamamba85 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I think your previous changeset comment might have got a bit "stuck" (this doesn't really look like "Updating golf course features"). Using changeset comments that explains what you are doing helps other people to help you.
If you've got any other questions, please feel free to ask over at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/us/78 (you can sign in with your regular OSM account).
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It looks like a couple of gaps got introduced into the North Cheshire Way here (it's a bit tricky seeing what is a member of what relation in Vespucci (and sometimes the names don't appear properly there!). The gaps can be seen at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/25Gt (that's from 7th June). I've filled them in to match what it was like on 29th May, so that it now looks like relation/63113#map=14/53.34630/-2.04617 .
You can use http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=63113&noCache=true&_noCache=on (and the "analyse on map" button there) to spot any gaps.
Best Regards,
Andy
PS: Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask!

Hello,
I think that something has gone wrong with the data here. On e.g. node/4548877130 I'd expect "diameter_crown" to be a number but it is instead "width: 2.0; color: green;". Maybe a json conversion went wrong?
There are 289 of these: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/25cT
Best Regards,
Andy

안녕하세요, 최이두두두두님, OpenStreetMap에 오신 것을 환영합니다!
지도를 제작하실 때는 속도를 늦춰주세요.
way/1391056097은 실제로 직사각형이어야 하고, way/1391056100은 건물 여러 개로 구성되어 있습니다.
온라인 편집기에서 "q" 키를 눌러 건물을 직사각형으로 만들 수 있습니다.
또한, 무엇을 했는지 설명하는 데 실제 단어를 사용해 주세요. "#hotosm-project-16193 #banjirdemak #disasterresponse #POI2024 "는 해시태그에 불과하며, 실제로 무엇을 매핑했는지, 어떤 출처를 사용했는지 등을 설명하지 않습니다.
문의 사항이 있으시면 "[Ticket#2025052710000367] 최이두두두"라는 제목으로 data@openstreetmap.org로 이메일을 보내주세요.
감사합니다,
앤디

Hello 최이두두두두 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Please do slow down when you are mapping things.
It's clear that way/1391056097 is actually supposed to be rectangular and way/1391056100 is more than one building.
You can make buildings rectangular by pressing "q" in the online editor.
Please also use actual words to describe what you did. "#hotosm-project-16193 #banjirdemak #disasterresponse #POI2024 " is just hashtag gibberish - it does not explain what you actually mapped, what sources you used, etc.
If you have any questions, please email data@openstreetmap.org with a subject line of "[Ticket#2025052710000367] 최이두두두두".
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks - are these technically maxweight or maxweightrating?

The latter is probably the more common (designed to keep hgvs off some roads, whether loaded or not), but the former also occurs (e.g. on weak bridges - where you also see axle limits).

No there isn't