Thanks for that!
Does that mean that the ways that are part of relation/13113383 could perhaps be moved to relation/31640 ?
There are a few other NCN routes that have several pieces like this (not for reasons of length), but I suspect that someone might consolidate them at some point.
The milepost (if it doesn't get moved) won't be the only one that's no longer 100% accurate after route moving / renaming!

Hello,
Just wondered - is relation/13113383#map=16/51.80928/-0.03301 part of relation/31640#map=16/51.80928/-0.03301 (or does the main route continue along the canal, past the NCN milepost node/160080113 )?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello Bamamba85 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I think your previous changeset comment might have got a bit "stuck" (this doesn't really look like "Updating golf course features"). Using changeset comments that explains what you are doing helps other people to help you.
If you've got any other questions, please feel free to ask over at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/us/78 (you can sign in with your regular OSM account).
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It looks like a couple of gaps got introduced into the North Cheshire Way here (it's a bit tricky seeing what is a member of what relation in Vespucci (and sometimes the names don't appear properly there!). The gaps can be seen at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/25Gt (that's from 7th June). I've filled them in to match what it was like on 29th May, so that it now looks like relation/63113#map=14/53.34630/-2.04617 .
You can use http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=63113&noCache=true&_noCache=on (and the "analyse on map" button there) to spot any gaps.
Best Regards,
Andy
PS: Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask!

Hello,
I think that something has gone wrong with the data here. On e.g. node/4548877130 I'd expect "diameter_crown" to be a number but it is instead "width: 2.0; color: green;". Maybe a json conversion went wrong?
There are 289 of these: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/25cT
Best Regards,
Andy

안녕하세요, 최이두두두두님, OpenStreetMap에 오신 것을 환영합니다!
지도를 제작하실 때는 속도를 늦춰주세요.
way/1391056097은 실제로 직사각형이어야 하고, way/1391056100은 건물 여러 개로 구성되어 있습니다.
온라인 편집기에서 "q" 키를 눌러 건물을 직사각형으로 만들 수 있습니다.
또한, 무엇을 했는지 설명하는 데 실제 단어를 사용해 주세요. "#hotosm-project-16193 #banjirdemak #disasterresponse #POI2024 "는 해시태그에 불과하며, 실제로 무엇을 매핑했는지, 어떤 출처를 사용했는지 등을 설명하지 않습니다.
문의 사항이 있으시면 "[Ticket#2025052710000367] 최이두두두"라는 제목으로 data@openstreetmap.org로 이메일을 보내주세요.
감사합니다,
앤디

Hello 최이두두두두 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Please do slow down when you are mapping things.
It's clear that way/1391056097 is actually supposed to be rectangular and way/1391056100 is more than one building.
You can make buildings rectangular by pressing "q" in the online editor.
Please also use actual words to describe what you did. "#hotosm-project-16193 #banjirdemak #disasterresponse #POI2024 " is just hashtag gibberish - it does not explain what you actually mapped, what sources you used, etc.
If you have any questions, please email data@openstreetmap.org with a subject line of "[Ticket#2025052710000367] 최이두두두두".
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks - are these technically maxweight or maxweightrating?

The latter is probably the more common (designed to keep hgvs off some roads, whether loaded or not), but the former also occurs (e.g. on weak bridges - where you also see axle limits).

No there isn't

Hello,
What was the source of these changes?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
How does the England Coast Path get across the gap at relation/11738490#map=19/51.131325/1.340773 ? Does it go up to the northwest and then back?
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks!

Are you sure that the height and diameter of node/2242260005/history are correct? It's apparently a London Plane that is 5 times wider than in is high. Are you sure that that that diameter number isn't a circumference?

Are you sure that the size values for node/3658274203 are correct?
circumference=0.04 and height=12 are plausible for a Silver Birch, but diameter_crown=77 is 6 times wider than it's high - unlikely for a Silver Birch, and unlikely to be supported by that 4cm-wide trunk

The tree node/10162104746/history seems to be a funny shape for a Sycamore - it's 12m high with a 30cm or so diameter trunk (which is fair enough) but has a crown diameter of 65m - 5.5 times larger than its height. Sycamores usually are not that shape...

The tree node/10162104746/history seems to be a funny shape for a Sycamore - it's 12m high with a 30cm or so diameter trunk (which is fair enough) but has a crown diameter of 65m - 5.5 times larger than its height. Sycamores usually are not that shape...

Hello,
Are the names of node/560045874 and node/12561176892 really "Brock Crags (Wainwright)" and "Brock Crags (summit)"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brock_Crags just has "Brock_Crags" (with one named, and one unnamed).
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I know it was a long time ago, but just spotted node/2847593295 - what battle actually was it?
Best Regards,
Andy

(with regard to the wiki) that's supposed to document how people map, not tell people how to map.
There are many, many wiki pages that contradict other wiki pages.
It's a useful guide, but all it tells you is that "the last person that edited that page thought X".

Actually, one more thing, "resolved issued detected by id " suggests that you think the suggestions that iD offers (including things like operator/brand, wikidata, etc.) are correct. My experience is that often they are not.
I personally would not accept any suggestion by iD unless I personally knew that the suggestion was correct.
One of the ways that iD can mess things up is described at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposed-automated-edit-removal-of-crossing-markings-yes-tags-introduced-in-undiscussed-automated-edits/129614/26 ; as noted there I logged that issue with them two years ago at https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/9529 with no positive effect.
I suspect that the presets that iD uses in Scandinavian countries will have had many fewer eyes on them than the UK ones, and many of those will be unfamiliar with grammar rules for e.g. apostrophes and capitalisation where they differ from English.